학술논문
전통시대 중국 지리서에 나타난 고구려인식
이용수 238
- 영문명
- Perception of Goguryeo Revealed in the Past Chinese Geographical Book
- 발행기관
- 한국사학사학회
- 저자명
- 박인호(Park, In-Ho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국사학사학보』제15권, 43~88쪽, 전체 46쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 역사학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.06.30
8,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This article aims to examine how the chinese cognized to Goguryeo in the geographies of Chinese traditional dynasties not in the Korean traditional historical records. It seems that the Chinese apparently didn't cognize to the stages of Goguryeo as a dynasty with the governing authority and they also showed the confused cognitions about the pre-Goguryeo dynasty and the Goguryeo dynasty. The chineses records to the same age of Goguryeo corresponding to the age of Buk-Wi shows that they cognized to Goguryeo dynasty as an immense
territorial dynasty and they had both the conflicting cognition and the view point which cognized Chinese as the core and Goguryeo as the branch by recording tribute custom from Goguryeo. In the historical records of Su and Dang Dynasties, most of them were filled with records about tribute custom from Goguryeo and their conquest events toward Goguryeo. That means they had the viewpoint rather of the antagonism than the concerns of the ways of lives of Goguryeo peoples. Chinese historical records were written by the viewpoint that they were different from Goguryeo in relating to race and ethnical relations and cultural custom and legislation. On the other hand, historical records of Goguryeo shows that Goguryeo had the differentiated cognition that
they were born as descendants of emperor in Heaven. In historical records of the late Dang dynasty and since Song dynasty, they show the differentiated cognition that Goguryeo were developed as the process
of the independent growth and development and downfall compared with Chinese. And they recognized Goguryeo as the antagonizing dynasty for Dang and Song dynasties. Peoples of Song dynasty were seemed that they didn't
know the ancient history of Korea before Goguryeo dynasty or they especially misunderstood some relating to Goguryeo dynasty. They showed the confused cognition that they misunderstood the Goguryeo as the Goryeo or the Silla as the Goryeo when they had described the histories of Goryeo dynasty. They understood differently that on the one hand, they regarded Goguryeo as the descendant of Buyeo, and as a uncultivated savage separated with chinese dynasty. On the other hand they described Goguryeo dynasty as the country that was taken the titles of court and books which recorded the lunar calendar from Chinese dynasties. It reveals that their cognition of Goguryeo were distorted more or less in the geographies of Won dynasty and they had ambiguously cognized in
relating to the succession from the Goguryeo to the Goryeo dynasty. Especially in the ≪Yosa≫ and ≪Geumsa≫ written in Won dynasty, they intended to scale down the reign area of the Goguryeo in the Yo-dong area by
expanding the reign area of Pre-chosun dynasty and Samhan into the Yo-dong area. In spite of that, it reveals that geographical records written in Won dynasty kept the same cognition revealed in geographies of Dang and
Song dynasties by preserving facts that the Goguryeo had originated fromBuyeo dynasty. But in passing over Myeong and Cheong dynasties, Chinese seemed to understand the korea as succeeding dynasties from Gija to Wiman, Hansagun, Samguk, Goryeo and Chosun dynasty. In geography written by Myeong dynasty, there were usually dealt with things of Chosun dynasty corresponding to Myeong dynasty. At the result, Goguryeo in geographies of Myeong dynasty was dealt poorly than geographies of Song and Won dynasties. In the part of historical geography of geographies Myeong dynasty, it usually dealt the fact that the Goguryeo occupied the area of Yodong after Jin dynasty. In geography written by Myeong dynasty, most of records focused on the Yodong area meant that Myeong dynasty had the increased interests of the Yodong area. In historical records written by Cheong dynasty, the chinese recognized that the Chosun dynasty was succeeded from the Goguryeo, Yemaek, Silla, Baekje
and Okjeo dynasties. On the other hand, it appeare
목차
1. 머리말
2. 고구려 건국 후 중국의 고구려인식
3. 고구려 멸망 후 중국의 고구려인식
4. 맺음말
키워드
고구려인식
화이관
전후 고구려
부여
고려
열전
『사고전서』
동북공정
The Chinese cognitions of Goguryeo
the pre-Goguryeo dynasty and the Goguryeo dynasty
the view point which cognized Chinesdynasty as the core and another dynasty as the branch
Buyeo
Goryeo
yeoljeun(a series of biographies)
Sagojeunseo
China's Northeast Project(a government-funded project on ancient societies in northern China)
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!