학술논문
죽음과 책임의 계보학
이용수 760
- 영문명
- Genealogy of Death and Responsibility: Rereading Derrida’s The Gift of Death
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- 윤일환(Ilhwan Yoon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제15권 1호, 87~121쪽, 전체 35쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
7,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In The Gift of Death, Jacques Derrida assesses Jan Patočka’s fundamental and original thesis of Heretical Essays on the History of Philosophy, namely, that the Platonic motif of the care of the soul is the embryo of European life and the starting point of the genealogy of responsibility in the history of Europe, and that only in Christian Europe the motif of the care of the soul is transformed into a true principle of responsibility. According to Patočka, in Christianity, the responsibility of the self or the soul does not derive from knowledge of the Divine, the cosmos, or the Good but from the soul’s exposure to the gaze of an other, ultimately the gaze of God as a Person, a gaze that constitutes the soul as a person and, for that, as a irreplaceable singular responsible self. Christian responsibility is also tied to a gift of death, because only death can give the irreplaceability on whose basis one can speak of a responsible subject, of the soul as conscience of self. Derrida, by the Blanchotian reading of death as im/possibility of impossibility in Heidegger’s Being and Time, explores the aporetic relationship between my irreplaceable and impossible responsibility for the Other. After establishing the aporetic relationship, Derrida continues to mark a decisive break with Kierkegaard and Levinas in an analysis of their Protestant interpretation of the Abrahamic story of the aborted sacrifice of Isaac, namely, that there is no convenient distinction between Kierkegaard’s
the ethical (of generality) and the religious (of absolute singularity). He further discusses the aporetic structure of responsibility where the absolute and the general meet. Responsibility demands faithfulness to the general with its insistence on answering for oneself, public accounting for decision making, in a word, substitution, and at the same time requires silence and secrecy, in a word, singularity. Derrida seeks to establish the matrix that at once makes their undeniably distinct positions on responsibility possible between Patočka, Heidegger, Kierkegaard and Levinas, but also limits their range, distinctiveness, radicality, and even their originality. By inquiring into the various modalities of giving (oneself) death and of taking death (upon
oneself) between these four philosophers, Derrida develops an economic model that accounts for the different positions on responsibility, their mutual contamination and passage into one another-in particular, as regards their overdetermination by themes of Christianity, Platonism, and deliberate de-Christianization as well as of Judaism.
목차
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!