본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

세르비아 민담과 한국 민담의 구조와 형식

이용수 117

영문명
The Structure and Form of Serbian and Korean Oral Literature
발행기관
한국중동부유럽학회
저자명
김상헌(Kim, Sang-Hun)
간행물 정보
『동유럽발칸학』동유럽발칸학 제4권 제1호, 226~251쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 지역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2002.06.30
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Structuralism is a scholarly methodology for the interpretation of human society and their cultures as well as human languages by logical thinking. This methodology wants to recognize relationships between some factors and the whole, and insists that some partial factors for the making of the object would find meanings when will be consolidated in a frame, so called a ‘structure’. Structuralism is appealing to some critics because it adds a certain objectivity, a scientific objectivity, to the realm of literary studies (which have often been criticized as purely subjective/ impressionistic). This scientific objectivity is achieved by subordinating ‘parole’ to ‘langue’, actual usage is abandoned in favor of studying the structure of a system in the abstract. Thus, structuralist readings ignore the specificity of actual texts and treat them as if they were like the patterns produced by iron filings moved by magnetic force - the result of some impersonal force or power, not the result of human effort. By focusing on the system itself, in a synchronic analysis, structuralists cancel out history. Most insist, as Lévi-Strauss does, that structures are universal, therefore timeless. Structuralists can't account for change or development; they are uninterested, for example, in how literary forms may have changed over time. They are not interested in a text's production or reception/consumption, but in the structures that shape it. In structuralism, the individuality of the text disappears in favor of looking at patterns, systems, and structures. Some structuralists and a related school of critics, so called the Russian Formalists, propose that all narratives can be charted as variations on certain basic universal narrative patterns. The aim of this study is to find similarities and differences in Serbian and Korean folktales from a standpoint of structuralism (by V. Propp and Lévi-Strauss) and the structure of the narrative.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 세르비아 민담과 한국 민담의 구조분석
Ⅲ. 세르비아 민담과 한국 민담의 형식분석
Ⅳ. 결 론
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김상헌(Kim, Sang-Hun). (2002).세르비아 민담과 한국 민담의 구조와 형식. 동유럽발칸학, 4 (1), 226-251

MLA

김상헌(Kim, Sang-Hun). "세르비아 민담과 한국 민담의 구조와 형식." 동유럽발칸학, 4.1(2002): 226-251

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제