학술논문
일본의 LLC 입법과 미국의 LLC 입법의 비교
이용수 127
- 영문명
- Comparison of the Japanese LLC Legislation with the U.S. LLC Legislation
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 김재문(Jae Moon Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제15권 제3호, 437~466쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.09.30
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The LLC is a very popular closely held business structure in the U.S. because it is recognized as the most favorable business structure to owners as it enables the owners to directly manage the business and yet to enjoy the limited liability privilege and to receive the pass through taxation (single taxation).
In response to this trend in the U.S., Japan has adopted “goudougaishya”, the so-called Japanese LLC into the new Company Act, that has been in force since 2006.
This paper’s aim is to give useful hints in introducing the LLC system into the Korean Commercial code by providing comparison of the Japanese LLC legislation with the U.S. legislation.
This paper does not mention the LLC draft in the revision bill of the Korean Commercial Code because it was already dealt with in another paper of mine.
The big differences between the Japanese legislation and that of the U.S. are as follows: First, the U.S. legislation gives flexibility in management structure in that it enables to choose between direct management by the owners and indirect management by the third party managers. Second, most states of the U.S. have not adopted the capital maintenance principle in the past and have instead taken insolvency or bankruptcy as tests in distribution. Third, in transferring member"s rights, the U.S. LLC distinguishes between financial rights and management rights and allows financial rights alone to be transferred separately. The break-through of the LLC, when compared with the traditional business structures, is that the owners enjoy the limited liability privilege even though they can manage the business themselves.
The traditional concept is that, if the owners directly manage the business themselves as in partnership or “hapmyunghoisa”, then they are personally liable for the business and, if the business is run by the third party managers as in corporation, then they are not personally liable for the business debt and are liable only for the agreed contribution to the business structure.
Further more, I think it is imminent that a proprietorship comes out where the owner is liable up to the business assets contributed and not with personal assets provided there is a public notice of limited liability and a complete separation of business assets and individual assets. In case of one man LLC’s, I think it already serves this function.
In response to this trend in the U.S., Japan has adopted “goudougaishya”, the so-called Japanese LLC into the new Company Act, that has been in force since 2006.
This paper’s aim is to give useful hints in introducing the LLC system into the Korean Commercial code by providing comparison of the Japanese LLC legislation with the U.S. legislation.
This paper does not mention the LLC draft in the revision bill of the Korean Commercial Code because it was already dealt with in another paper of mine.
The big differences between the Japanese legislation and that of the U.S. are as follows: First, the U.S. legislation gives flexibility in management structure in that it enables to choose between direct management by the owners and indirect management by the third party managers. Second, most states of the U.S. have not adopted the capital maintenance principle in the past and have instead taken insolvency or bankruptcy as tests in distribution. Third, in transferring member"s rights, the U.S. LLC distinguishes between financial rights and management rights and allows financial rights alone to be transferred separately. The break-through of the LLC, when compared with the traditional business structures, is that the owners enjoy the limited liability privilege even though they can manage the business themselves.
The traditional concept is that, if the owners directly manage the business themselves as in partnership or “hapmyunghoisa”, then they are personally liable for the business and, if the business is run by the third party managers as in corporation, then they are not personally liable for the business debt and are liable only for the agreed contribution to the business structure.
Further more, I think it is imminent that a proprietorship comes out where the owner is liable up to the business assets contributed and not with personal assets provided there is a public notice of limited liability and a complete separation of business assets and individual assets. In case of one man LLC’s, I think it already serves this function.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 일본의 LLC 입법
Ⅲ. 미국의 LLC 입법
Ⅳ. 양 입법의 비교
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. 일본의 LLC 입법
Ⅲ. 미국의 LLC 입법
Ⅳ. 양 입법의 비교
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 民法 第485條의 債權者의 擔保保存義務
- 건물의 부분전세권자의 경매청구권에 관한 연구
- 금융리스계약의 하자담보책임
- 대부이자의 상한규제에 대한 비교법적 고찰
- 독립당사자참가와 상소 - 최근의 대법원판례를 소재로
- 온실가스 排出權 去來의 금융법상 논점
- 건물의 양도시 하자담보추급권자 - 프랑스 법으로부터의 시사와 집합건물법 제9조의 적용 확대 가능성
- 일본회사법상 옵션발행에 관한 연구
- 생명보험회사의 계약자배당에 대한 법적 고찰
- 病院感染損害에 대한 責任問題와 그 對策方案
- 國際的 扶養義務에 관한 硏究
- 서해안 기름 유출 사고와 삼성중공업의 배상책임
- 계약채무의 불이행으로 인한 비용배상
- 학회활동현황 외
- 일본의 LLC 입법과 미국의 LLC 입법의 비교
- 刊行辭
- 독일 소비자정보법(VIG)의 내용과 비판 등
- 학회활동 현황(2008.7.1 - 2008.9.30) 외
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!