독립당사자참가와 상소 - 최근의 대법원판례를 소재로

• 영문명: The Third Party Intervention and Appeal: Referring to the Recent Supreme Court Cases
• 발행기관: 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
• 저자명: 김상수(Sang-Soo Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『비교사법』比較私法 제15권 제3호, 411~435쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.09.30

영문 초록

  When the party who loses a suit of the third party intervention doesn’t appeal, a position of the non appeal party in such appeal process becomes a problem. On this problem, the Theory of the Party in Appeal is insisted. This theory generally discusses the trial structure in the appeal by a priori method. On the other hand, there was hardly the judicial precedent’s having handled this problem directly. However, recently two important judicial precedents that handled this problem were continuously rendered.
  The judicial precedent is not taking of certain one standpoint said by the theory. Oppositely the judicial precedent is a standpoint that the trial structure of the appeal is reasonably treatable in the limit union finding concerning all parties even if certain one standpoint is not taken. Consequentially, the judicial precedent is appropriate, and there is no problem in the conclusion of such precedent.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 대법원판례의 사실의 개요
Ⅲ. 대법원판례의 판결요지
Ⅳ. 독립당사자참가에서의 상소심의 처리
Ⅴ. 판례의 검토와 사견
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]

키워드

독립당사자참가 합일확정 상소 불이익변경의 금지 상소심당사자설 The Third Party Intervention Union Finding Concerning all Parties Appeal Prohibition of Change to Disadvantage Theory of the Party in Appeal