본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

일본의 성년후견제도와 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 비교

이용수 144

영문명
A Comparison of the Adult Guardianship Laws of Japan with the Adult Guardianship Bill of Korean
발행기관
한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
저자명
오호철(Ho-Cheol O)
간행물 정보
『비교사법』比較私法 제15권 제2호, 295~335쪽, 전체 41쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2008.06.01
7,720

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  Our country’s social problem of low birth rate and aging is at a severe level. Currently, the legal system to actively deal with the problem of low birth rate and aging through Korean civil laws is extremely inadequate. In particular, as we become an aged society, the civil laws which is applied when the mental judgement is deteriorated, has many problems.
  Under the current civil laws, incompetence and quasi-incompetence system can be used in case of deterioration of mental judgement. In the cases of incompetence and quasi-incompetence system, the system itself is rigid since it can only provide two types by law despite the fact that there are various degrees of mental judgement and protection needs based on each individual. And it is pronounced as incompetence and quasi-incompetence, it will be recorded in the census registration and hence there are hardly anyone who use this system. In addition, there are resistance and social prejudice against the words such as incompetence and quasi-incompetence. Hence, the system is practically not being used and is ending up as a mere scrap paper.
  The same situation is applicable to Japan. Hence, in order to actively deal with these problems, Japan enforced the new adult guardianship laws on 1 April, 2000. There has been discussions of introducing the adult guardianship laws but this ended up as just discussions, being excluded from the civil laws that was proposed in the National Assembly on 21 October 2004. And the adult guardianship laws was later proposed on 28 August 2006. Hence, this paper researches what should be considered in our laws by making comparative study of the Korean and Japanese adult guardianship laws.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 일본의 성년후견제도의 개관
Ⅲ. 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 개관
Ⅳ. 맺는 말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

오호철(Ho-Cheol O). (2008).일본의 성년후견제도와 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 비교. 비교사법, 15 (2), 295-335

MLA

오호철(Ho-Cheol O). "일본의 성년후견제도와 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 비교." 비교사법, 15.2(2008): 295-335

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제