학술논문
反국가안보 외국인 투자규제법의 도입 이유
이용수 36
- 영문명
- Reasons to Enact Laws Regulating Foreign Investment for National Security
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 왕상한(Sang-Han Wang)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제15권 제2호, 83~112쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.06.01
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In 1997, Korea faced a financial crisis. Almost all defense devises for protecting the management were deprived of from Korea enterprises saying that those were obstacles to foreign investment in Korea. The most important national agent at that time was to induce the foreign investment. And now, Korea became the easiest country where they merge and/or acquisite the company either friendly or hostilly.
No one argues that the foreign investment is important for the national economy. However, it is arguable whether we must allow all kinds of investments in any situation or we must limit the foreign investments under some circumstances. Recently, we have seen an argument that there must be a regulation even by the ones who has been very supportive to foreign investments. Furthermore, there newly started a National Committee for Protecting Basic Industries which consists of Federation of Korean Industries, Korean Unions, etc., and it publicly announced that there must be a law regulating foreign investment for security reasons. This was heavily cited by the presses.
There are several bills at the Korean National Assembly. Those bills are in common that there must be a committee where it reviews the foreing investment whether it would negatively affects the national security in Korea. The reason that they call this bills as “Korean Exon-Florio Act” is it was made after the Exon-Florio Act in U.S.
However, there have been serious debates over these bills. This paper reviews major reasons for opposing those bills and critically analyzed whether those arguments are persuasive enough. By way of analyzing those arguments, this paper showed why we must enact the law regulating foreign investment in Korea for security reasons.
No one argues that the foreign investment is important for the national economy. However, it is arguable whether we must allow all kinds of investments in any situation or we must limit the foreign investments under some circumstances. Recently, we have seen an argument that there must be a regulation even by the ones who has been very supportive to foreign investments. Furthermore, there newly started a National Committee for Protecting Basic Industries which consists of Federation of Korean Industries, Korean Unions, etc., and it publicly announced that there must be a law regulating foreign investment for security reasons. This was heavily cited by the presses.
There are several bills at the Korean National Assembly. Those bills are in common that there must be a committee where it reviews the foreing investment whether it would negatively affects the national security in Korea. The reason that they call this bills as “Korean Exon-Florio Act” is it was made after the Exon-Florio Act in U.S.
However, there have been serious debates over these bills. This paper reviews major reasons for opposing those bills and critically analyzed whether those arguments are persuasive enough. By way of analyzing those arguments, this paper showed why we must enact the law regulating foreign investment in Korea for security reasons.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. ‘국가안보에 반하는 외국인 투자규제법’ 반대 논거 비판
Ⅲ. 맺음말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. ‘국가안보에 반하는 외국인 투자규제법’ 반대 논거 비판
Ⅲ. 맺음말
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 생명공학적 발명의 보호와 한계 - 유럽연합의 생명공학지침(Directive 98/44/EC)을 중심으로
- 학회활동 현황(2008.4.1 - 2008.6.30) 외
- 주택임대차보호법 제9조에 의한 임차권의 승계 - 주택임대차보호법 제9조의 해석상의 문제를 중심으로
- A Change in Direction for New Zealand’s International Tax Regime - Recent Legal Developments
- 契約自由에 있어서 自由에 관한 管見
- 독일 제조물안전법에 관한 小考
- 일본의 성년후견제도와 우리나라의 성년후견법안의 비교
- 프랑스의 상표보호제도에 관한 연구
- 法律行爲의 要件體系와 土地去來許可
- 상법상 주식회사의 집행임원제 도입에 관한 연구 - 특히 실증적 조사에 관한 검토의견의 부가
- Consumer Law in the United States - FTC and Consumer Protection
- 反국가안보 외국인 투자규제법의 도입 이유
- 화물인도지시서의 법적 지위 - ship’s delivery order를 중심으로
- 중국 사법해석제도에 관한 고찰 - 최고인민법원의 사법해석을 중심으로
- 知的財産權의 流動化를 위한 法的 改善方案
- 契約의 補充的 解釋
- 판결의 제3자적 효력의 본질과 그밖의 판결의 효력에 관한 검토
- 刊行辭
- 혼합법계로서의 필리핀 법체계에 대한 소고 - 혼합법계의 형성과정 및 그 내용을 중심으로
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!