학술논문
性別에 따른 平等權의 問題 - 憲法裁判所 判例를 中心으로
이용수 169
- 영문명
- The Problem of equal right on Account of Gender - Focusing on the Constitutional Court Precedents -
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 한상운(Han Sang-Woon) 이창훈(Lee Chang-Hoon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第14卷 第1號, 137~165쪽, 전체 29쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.03.30
6,280원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The equal right of both sexes means as well as another civil rights not only the subjective right, it extends to the element of the objective public orders. Therefore Article 11, Section 1, the Constitution of the Republic of Korea orders not only that the nation should not discriminate for the reason of gender, but also that the nation takes the constitutional responsibility to accomplish the equality of both sexes in reality.
The Article allows the nation to give various preferential treatments for women (for example, affirmative action) in order to realize effectively the equality of both sexes. The Sexes Equality Realization and Women-Amicable Affirmative Action must be understood a problem of legislation policy.
By the way, the position of the Constitutional Court in the judicial re-view on the equal protection with regard to essential treatment may be vague. Specially, the recent decision of the Constitutional Court has been shown controversial in the case of “giving discharged soldier benefit in the exam to become a civil servant.”
In result, the Constitutional Court"s standpoint is possibly controversial. This is because the Constitutional Court has adopted “review standard of two Step,” i.e. “Mere Rationality Test” ― “Strict Scrutiny.” But there are some inconsistency among standards that it has adopted. Standards are founded on misconception about levels of scrutiny.
For the constitutionality of gender affirmative action, it is required to keep balance of conflicting interests between the purposes of action and disadvantages of the man. Thus the affirmative action is not unnecessarily to trammel the rights of the male employees.
The Article allows the nation to give various preferential treatments for women (for example, affirmative action) in order to realize effectively the equality of both sexes. The Sexes Equality Realization and Women-Amicable Affirmative Action must be understood a problem of legislation policy.
By the way, the position of the Constitutional Court in the judicial re-view on the equal protection with regard to essential treatment may be vague. Specially, the recent decision of the Constitutional Court has been shown controversial in the case of “giving discharged soldier benefit in the exam to become a civil servant.”
In result, the Constitutional Court"s standpoint is possibly controversial. This is because the Constitutional Court has adopted “review standard of two Step,” i.e. “Mere Rationality Test” ― “Strict Scrutiny.” But there are some inconsistency among standards that it has adopted. Standards are founded on misconception about levels of scrutiny.
For the constitutionality of gender affirmative action, it is required to keep balance of conflicting interests between the purposes of action and disadvantages of the man. Thus the affirmative action is not unnecessarily to trammel the rights of the male employees.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 평등의 규범적 의미와 성(性)
Ⅲ. 성차별에 대한 평등심사구조와 기준
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 평등의 규범적 의미와 성(性)
Ⅲ. 성차별에 대한 평등심사구조와 기준
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 性別에 따른 平等權의 問題 - 憲法裁判所 判例를 中心으로
- 헌법재판소장 및 헌법재판관 후보자 지명권 - 전효숙에 대한 지명권 행사를 중심으로
- 憲法原理에서 본 市民運動
- 過少保護禁止原則에 관한 硏究
- 과실책임주의에 대한 헌법적 검토 - 헌재 2007. 8. 30. 2004헌가25
- 표현의 자유와 국가안보 - 국가안보와 관련한 독일기본법상 표현의 자유의 제한에 대한 비교법적 고찰
- 감사원과 지방자치제
- 헌법의 존재의미로서의 국가성: EU의 국가성 고찰 - 리스본 조약에 대한 분석을 중심으로
- 헌법개념의 역사적 전개(Ⅰ)
- 헌법재판소의 변형결정에 대한 비판적 검토
- CCTV감시에 대한 개인정보보호법의 규율에 대한 헌법적 평가
- 社團法人 韓國憲法學會 定款 외
- 발간사
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!