학술논문
Politically Sensitive Case and Judicial Activism in Korean Judiciary: Focusing on the Felony Case of Former Presidents Chun & Roh
이용수 29
- 영문명
- Politically Sensitive Case and Judicial Activism in Korean Judiciary: Focusing on the Felony Case of Former Presidents Chun & Roh
- 발행기관
- 세계헌법학회 한국학회
- 저자명
- Jibong Lim(임지봉)
- 간행물 정보
- 『세계헌법연구』世界憲法硏究 第13卷 第2號, 247~272쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.01
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In the past, Korean judiciary showed judicial passivism by usually showing judicial deference rather than judicial intrusion for legislative or executive decision or power. However, since military regime ended in early 1990s, Korean judiciary has issued many decisions based on judicial activism and even has not hesitated to deal with politically sensitive cases. The felony case of former Presidents Chun & Roh dealt by Korean Supreme Court would be a representative example. This paper analyzesthe case in terms of the dichotomy of judicial activism and judicial passivism.
In addition, it compares the former Presidents case with similar American and Japanese cases on several issues. Political question issue would be the first comparing point. Whether a successful Coup d’etat could be dealt by the judiciary and punished by the judicial decision is examined comparing similar politically-sensitivecases such as Baker v. Carr(1962), Luther v. Bordon(1849) and United States v. Nixon(1974) issued by U.S Supreme Court. A Japanese Supreme Court case, Koshiyama v. Chairman, Tokyo Metropolitan Election Comm’n, would be analyzed and compared in terms of political question doctrine as well.
This paper also points out the problem of inconsistency in legal decisions on the same case which the former Korean Presidents case has. As for the same case, the decisions by Korean prosecution’s office, Korean Constitutional Court and Korean Supreme Court were, more or less, different. Finally, this paper deals withthe issue of pardon which was made by the President after the Korean Supreme Court decision. It explores how the presidential pardon undermines the dignity of judiciary.
In addition, it compares the former Presidents case with similar American and Japanese cases on several issues. Political question issue would be the first comparing point. Whether a successful Coup d’etat could be dealt by the judiciary and punished by the judicial decision is examined comparing similar politically-sensitivecases such as Baker v. Carr(1962), Luther v. Bordon(1849) and United States v. Nixon(1974) issued by U.S Supreme Court. A Japanese Supreme Court case, Koshiyama v. Chairman, Tokyo Metropolitan Election Comm’n, would be analyzed and compared in terms of political question doctrine as well.
This paper also points out the problem of inconsistency in legal decisions on the same case which the former Korean Presidents case has. As for the same case, the decisions by Korean prosecution’s office, Korean Constitutional Court and Korean Supreme Court were, more or less, different. Finally, this paper deals withthe issue of pardon which was made by the President after the Korean Supreme Court decision. It explores how the presidential pardon undermines the dignity of judiciary.
목차
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. DEFINING JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND JUDICIAL PASSIVISM
Ⅲ. FORMER PRESIDENTS CHUN AND ROH CASE AND JUDICIAL PASSIVISM
Ⅳ. COMPARISON WITH AMERICAN AND JAPANESE CASES ON ISSUES
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
ABSTRACT
Ⅱ. DEFINING JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND JUDICIAL PASSIVISM
Ⅲ. FORMER PRESIDENTS CHUN AND ROH CASE AND JUDICIAL PASSIVISM
Ⅳ. COMPARISON WITH AMERICAN AND JAPANESE CASES ON ISSUES
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
ABSTRACT
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 일본의 경험에 비춰본 한국 국립대학법인화 작업의 평가
- 世界憲法硏究 刊行規定 외
- 적극적 우대조치의 합헌성에 대한 연구 - 여성을 위한 적극적 평등조치로서 여성채용목표제와 양성평등채용목표제에 관한 판단을 중심으로
- 민주주의의 기능에 관한 헌법적 고찰
- Die Sozialbindung des Eigentums an Grundstücken in Korea
- 아동의 권리에 관한 고찰
- 독일 기본법상 헌법충실과 헌법재판
- 벤담의 법개념과 입법론에 대한 소고
- 獨逸 聯邦議會選擧制度와 그 受容必要性에 관한 硏究
- Resolving political conflicts through the constitutional adjudication in Korea
- 프랑스의 대학 자치 제도와 우리나라 국립대 법인화에 관한 법적 문제
- 미국 연방대법원의 헌법재판권의 범위와 삼중 위헌심사 기준론에 관한 소고
- Politically Sensitive Case and Judicial Activism in Korean Judiciary: Focusing on the Felony Case of Former Presidents Chun & Roh
- 發刊辭
- 제왕적 대통령제의 특징의 일환으로서 사면권 행사의 통제방안
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!