학술논문
기본권구제수단으로서의 법령소원에 있어서 보충성원칙의 재검토
이용수 156
- 영문명
- Reexamination of the Rule of Exhaustion of Other Remedies in Constitutional Complaints concerning Laws, Executive Orders, Rules, and Regulations
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 정강찬(Kangchan Jeong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第13卷 第4號, 91~125쪽, 전체 35쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
7,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The rule of exhaustion of other remedies as the legal prerequisite to constitutional complaintsstipulated in Article 68, paragraph 1 of the Constitutional Court Act should be firmly observed even with respect to the constitutional complaints whose subject matters concern ordinary laws, executive orders, rules, and regulations.
The precedent decisions of the Constitutional Court have consistently pronounced that other legal remedies mean only thosewhich can nullify the power of state directly, but do not meanother procedures in ordinary courts such as civil litigation where such matters can be properly dealt with, and that when subject matters challenged in constitutional complaints are norms such as laws and so on, the rule of exhaustion of other remedies is not applied as the legal prerequisite because there is no procedure in ordinary courts to nullify such norms directly.
However, the German and Austrian cases strictly applythe rule of exhaustion of other remedies to all cases. In addition, systematic and coherent interpretation may well be found betweenArticle 107, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Korean Constitution and Article 68 paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Korean Constitutional Court Act. These interpretations strongly support the necessity for the Constitutional Court to reevaluate its prior decisions to the direction to acknowledge that other procedures in ordinary courts are also legal remedies meant in applying the rule of exhaustion of other remedies as long as they are efficient for the relief of the relevant rights. The rule of exhaustion of other remedies should be equally maintained even when subject matters disputed under constitutional complaints by Article 68, paragraph 1 of the Constitutional Court Act are such norms as ordinary laws, executive orders, rules, and regulations.
The precedent decisions of the Constitutional Court have consistently pronounced that other legal remedies mean only thosewhich can nullify the power of state directly, but do not meanother procedures in ordinary courts such as civil litigation where such matters can be properly dealt with, and that when subject matters challenged in constitutional complaints are norms such as laws and so on, the rule of exhaustion of other remedies is not applied as the legal prerequisite because there is no procedure in ordinary courts to nullify such norms directly.
However, the German and Austrian cases strictly applythe rule of exhaustion of other remedies to all cases. In addition, systematic and coherent interpretation may well be found betweenArticle 107, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Korean Constitution and Article 68 paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Korean Constitutional Court Act. These interpretations strongly support the necessity for the Constitutional Court to reevaluate its prior decisions to the direction to acknowledge that other procedures in ordinary courts are also legal remedies meant in applying the rule of exhaustion of other remedies as long as they are efficient for the relief of the relevant rights. The rule of exhaustion of other remedies should be equally maintained even when subject matters disputed under constitutional complaints by Article 68, paragraph 1 of the Constitutional Court Act are such norms as ordinary laws, executive orders, rules, and regulations.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 보충성 원칙에 관한 외국의 입법례 및 판례
Ⅲ. 권리구제형 법령소원에 있어서 보충성 원칙
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 보충성 원칙에 관한 외국의 입법례 및 판례
Ⅲ. 권리구제형 법령소원에 있어서 보충성 원칙
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 교육권, 학습권, 평생학습권, 그리고 법학
- 비례대표선거와 초과의석 - 초과의석의 헌법적 문제점과 도입가능성을 중심으로
- 개헌의 바람직한 방향 - 정부의 개헌시안에 대한 비판적 분석과 기본권규정 개정을 중심으로
- 기본권구제수단으로서의 법령소원에 있어서 보충성원칙의 재검토
- 법경제학이론들의 헌법상 사회적 시장경제 원칙에서의 의미
- 과학기술의 발달과 기본권 해석의 재조명 - 사법부의 역할과 기능을 중심으로
- 북한환경법에 관한 기초연구
- 정신보건법과 정신장애인의 인권
- 재산권보장에 있어서 기본권이론의 적용
- 社團法人 韓國憲法學會 定款 외
- 행정청의 부작위로 인한 기본권 침해의 구제 - ‘한일 청구권협정’에 따른 중재요청불이행 위헌확인 사건에 대한 헌법재판소 결정(98헌마206)의 검토를 포함하여
- 발간사
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!