학술논문
과학기술의 발달과 기본권 해석의 재조명 - 사법부의 역할과 기능을 중심으로
이용수 163
- 영문명
- Theory of interpretation in constitutional law and the human rights in the 21st century - on the focus of the judicial role and function -
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 朴宣映(PARK Sun-Young)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第13卷 第4號, 1~46쪽, 전체 46쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
8,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Constitutional law is understood as the fundamental norms of liberal, democratic and social constitutional countries. Because the constitutional law formulated in language has many possibilities of diverse interpretation, the topic of constitutional law interpretation, especially in the part of fhuman right"s interpretation than in governmental construction, has long been a major branch of legal theory and philosophy. Recent rapid scientific technology developments have raised important judicial issues from bad to worse in relation to the interpretation of the human rights. The cases that have been coming before the court in recent years pose serious interpretive challenges.
In this paper, I suggest the method of fundamental rights interpretation based on the human dignity principle with a concise overview of human rights norms and the institutional context within which they evolve. It is interesting to note that there are so many different systems for presumably one basic set of human rights and principles, though again this makes sense because each fundamental right has its own principles and interpretations of what is a "right". So I sketch the structure and procedures of the human rights interpretation method, the character of rights, the function and limit of the judicature, the general style and structure of decisions in which judges write in cases of modem scientific rights. This paper analyzes the idea that creative interpretation and choice in interpretation amounts, by default, to illegitimate discretion and is used to wave the flag of judicial self-restraint. In conclusion, I try to newly establish the concept, function and protection of basic constitutional value, human dignity under the korean constitutional law through the interpretations on fundamental rights.
There would be a tendency towards broadening judge"s competence over fundamental rights interpretation in the 21st century. So every courts can-not help substantially functioning as a law-making authority through the interpretation course as a the final constructionist. There is nothing for it but to recognize this circumstance in spite of the principle of separation of powers. Thus, judges have to have more open-minded, or at least open to debate and interpretation, and make more difficult to review the justification of decision, the rationality or reasonableness of interpretation to widen and enlarge the human dignity in the 21st century. "Human dignity norms" might not be interpreted as existing in name only.
In this paper, I suggest the method of fundamental rights interpretation based on the human dignity principle with a concise overview of human rights norms and the institutional context within which they evolve. It is interesting to note that there are so many different systems for presumably one basic set of human rights and principles, though again this makes sense because each fundamental right has its own principles and interpretations of what is a "right". So I sketch the structure and procedures of the human rights interpretation method, the character of rights, the function and limit of the judicature, the general style and structure of decisions in which judges write in cases of modem scientific rights. This paper analyzes the idea that creative interpretation and choice in interpretation amounts, by default, to illegitimate discretion and is used to wave the flag of judicial self-restraint. In conclusion, I try to newly establish the concept, function and protection of basic constitutional value, human dignity under the korean constitutional law through the interpretations on fundamental rights.
There would be a tendency towards broadening judge"s competence over fundamental rights interpretation in the 21st century. So every courts can-not help substantially functioning as a law-making authority through the interpretation course as a the final constructionist. There is nothing for it but to recognize this circumstance in spite of the principle of separation of powers. Thus, judges have to have more open-minded, or at least open to debate and interpretation, and make more difficult to review the justification of decision, the rationality or reasonableness of interpretation to widen and enlarge the human dignity in the 21st century. "Human dignity norms" might not be interpreted as existing in name only.
목차
Ⅰ. 기본권 해석의 창조적 기능
Ⅱ. 기본권 갈등의 심화원인과 기본권 해석의 변화 필요성
Ⅲ. 과학기술의 발달과 기본권 해석의 문제
Ⅳ. 결론 : 기본권보장 책무로서의 헌법해석
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 기본권 갈등의 심화원인과 기본권 해석의 변화 필요성
Ⅲ. 과학기술의 발달과 기본권 해석의 문제
Ⅳ. 결론 : 기본권보장 책무로서의 헌법해석
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 교육권, 학습권, 평생학습권, 그리고 법학
- 비례대표선거와 초과의석 - 초과의석의 헌법적 문제점과 도입가능성을 중심으로
- 개헌의 바람직한 방향 - 정부의 개헌시안에 대한 비판적 분석과 기본권규정 개정을 중심으로
- 기본권구제수단으로서의 법령소원에 있어서 보충성원칙의 재검토
- 법경제학이론들의 헌법상 사회적 시장경제 원칙에서의 의미
- 과학기술의 발달과 기본권 해석의 재조명 - 사법부의 역할과 기능을 중심으로
- 북한환경법에 관한 기초연구
- 정신보건법과 정신장애인의 인권
- 재산권보장에 있어서 기본권이론의 적용
- 社團法人 韓國憲法學會 定款 외
- 행정청의 부작위로 인한 기본권 침해의 구제 - ‘한일 청구권협정’에 따른 중재요청불이행 위헌확인 사건에 대한 헌법재판소 결정(98헌마206)의 검토를 포함하여
- 발간사
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!