본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

辯護人의 眞實義務와 陳述拒否權 行使勸告 - 대법원 2007.1.13.자 2006모656 결정

이용수 153

영문명
Lawyers" Duty to Tell the Truth and Recommendation to Exercise the Right to Remain Silent
발행기관
중앙대학교 법학연구원
저자명
金亨埈(Hyung-Joon Kim)
간행물 정보
『법학논문집』法學論文集 第31輯 第1號, 263~276쪽, 전체 14쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2007.08.30
4,480

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  Lawyers in the criminal procedures should assume a public "guardian" status to cooperate in the legitimate enforcement of governmental criminal sentences. In this regard, it is beyond dispute that lawyers in criminal cases should tell the whole truth. True as it may be, the attorneys" public “guardian" status should be differentiated from that of prosecutors who should be in pursuit of substantive truth, simultaneously focusing on achieving the protective functions of criminal system. That is, the public "guardian" status of criminal lawyers finds its distinction from that of prosector in that the former puts first and forefront priority on its clients" best interests and secure the substantive truth within the scope of due process through continuous struggles with courts and prosecutors. In this sense, it may well be that criminal lawyers are obliged to be more aggressive and thorough in protecting their defendant clients based on duty to protect their clients which preempts the duty to tell the truth.
  Therefore, the positions of the Supreme Court in this case should be duly noted that “while lawyers should assume the duty to tell the truth according to the Korea"s Code of Professional Responsibility, it is also their duty as well as right to provide legal counsel to their clients in detention and cannot be regarded to be contravening their duty to tell the truth by informing his client of the constitutional right to remain silent and then recommending excercise of this right, not engaged in positively advising false statement, deception, conceit, or misrepresentation.”

목차

Ⅰ. 사건개요 및 결정이유
Ⅱ. 연구

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

金亨埈(Hyung-Joon Kim). (2007).辯護人의 眞實義務와 陳述拒否權 行使勸告 - 대법원 2007.1.13.자 2006모656 결정. 법학논문집, 31 (1), 263-276

MLA

金亨埈(Hyung-Joon Kim). "辯護人의 眞實義務와 陳述拒否權 行使勸告 - 대법원 2007.1.13.자 2006모656 결정." 법학논문집, 31.1(2007): 263-276

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제