학술논문
契約解除의 本質 및 效果
이용수 177
- 영문명
- Nature and Effect of the Cancellation for Breach of Contract
- 발행기관
- 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 저자명
- 金大貞(Kim Dae-Jeong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第31輯 第1號, 97~130쪽, 전체 34쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.08.30
6,880원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
(1) The system of a cancellation of the Korean Civil code(KBGB) inherited the system of a cancellation of the abrogated old Korean Civil code(the Japanese Civil code), and the system is a compromise between the system of French Civil code(Code civil) and the system of German Civil code(BGB).
(2) The system of a cancellation is a system that has been designed for protecting the innocent party(creditor) who has already performed his contractual obligations in bilateral contract. The institutional significance of the system of a cancellation is that it is a special remedies for innocent party(creditor) to free himself unilaterally from biding force of contract. Namely, the system of a cancellation is a system that is recognized by the Principle of Good faith and Fair dealing to protect innocent party effectively and that is the system for making up for the weak points in the system of damages for breach of contract. By understanding the nature of a cancellation as the sytem of making up for the weak points in the system of damages for breach of contract, we can clear up the §551 of KBGB that admits the retrospective effect of cancellation of the contract ab initio, while admits the concurrence of damages for breach of contract.
(3) The question whether a cancellation of the contract has a retrospective effect or not is not the pure theoretical problem but the problem of a definite decision in optional legislative policies. Therefore, the question which is proper interpretative theory on the KBGB between ?the theory of directive effect? and ?the theory of relation of liquidation? is dependent upon whether KBGB provide the retrospective effect to restore the status quo ante(restitution of performance, thus restoring the parties to their precontractual positions) of contract as the effect of the cancellation or not. From this point of view, we can say that the KBGB coincide with ?the Theory of directive effect?. Because the KBGB clearly distinguish between a termination of the contract which simply brings to an end any duty to perform obligations which have not yet been performed and a cancellation of the contract which rescind the whole contract ab initio to restore the status quo ante, and the KBGB provides the third party protection clause §548(1) that supposes a proprietary effect of a cancellation of the contract.
(4) Restoration the status quo ante by the cancellation of the contract has proprietary effect, and the right to claim restoration for a cancellation of the contract has a nature as a proprietary right to claim. The §548(1) is a special clause to prevent destroying the safety of deal that caused by restoring the real right to original owner by cancellation of the contract as a matter of course.
(5) The essential contents of a cancellation of the contract is to restore the status quo ante(the original condition) that has proprietary effect for making up for the real problem(weak points) in the system of damages for breach of contract. So even the effect of a contract extinguishs retrospectively by a cancellation of the contract but the right to claim damages for breach of contract(non-performance) does not extinguish. The §551 of KBGB is the prescription that makes clear this point of view. And although the law make fiction that the contract has been extinguished retrospectively by a cancellation of the contract, the real losses of a innocent party for breach of contract would never extinguish. Therefore, it would be desirable to recognize the right of a innocent party to claim damages for breach of contract separately the retrospective effect of a cancellation of the contract and the effect of restoring the status quo ante.
(2) The system of a cancellation is a system that has been designed for protecting the innocent party(creditor) who has already performed his contractual obligations in bilateral contract. The institutional significance of the system of a cancellation is that it is a special remedies for innocent party(creditor) to free himself unilaterally from biding force of contract. Namely, the system of a cancellation is a system that is recognized by the Principle of Good faith and Fair dealing to protect innocent party effectively and that is the system for making up for the weak points in the system of damages for breach of contract. By understanding the nature of a cancellation as the sytem of making up for the weak points in the system of damages for breach of contract, we can clear up the §551 of KBGB that admits the retrospective effect of cancellation of the contract ab initio, while admits the concurrence of damages for breach of contract.
(3) The question whether a cancellation of the contract has a retrospective effect or not is not the pure theoretical problem but the problem of a definite decision in optional legislative policies. Therefore, the question which is proper interpretative theory on the KBGB between ?the theory of directive effect? and ?the theory of relation of liquidation? is dependent upon whether KBGB provide the retrospective effect to restore the status quo ante(restitution of performance, thus restoring the parties to their precontractual positions) of contract as the effect of the cancellation or not. From this point of view, we can say that the KBGB coincide with ?the Theory of directive effect?. Because the KBGB clearly distinguish between a termination of the contract which simply brings to an end any duty to perform obligations which have not yet been performed and a cancellation of the contract which rescind the whole contract ab initio to restore the status quo ante, and the KBGB provides the third party protection clause §548(1) that supposes a proprietary effect of a cancellation of the contract.
(4) Restoration the status quo ante by the cancellation of the contract has proprietary effect, and the right to claim restoration for a cancellation of the contract has a nature as a proprietary right to claim. The §548(1) is a special clause to prevent destroying the safety of deal that caused by restoring the real right to original owner by cancellation of the contract as a matter of course.
(5) The essential contents of a cancellation of the contract is to restore the status quo ante(the original condition) that has proprietary effect for making up for the real problem(weak points) in the system of damages for breach of contract. So even the effect of a contract extinguishs retrospectively by a cancellation of the contract but the right to claim damages for breach of contract(non-performance) does not extinguish. The §551 of KBGB is the prescription that makes clear this point of view. And although the law make fiction that the contract has been extinguished retrospectively by a cancellation of the contract, the real losses of a innocent party for breach of contract would never extinguish. Therefore, it would be desirable to recognize the right of a innocent party to claim damages for breach of contract separately the retrospective effect of a cancellation of the contract and the effect of restoring the status quo ante.
목차
Ⅰ. 序說
Ⅱ. 解除制度의 沿革 및 立法例
Ⅲ. 解除의 本質 및 理論的 根據
Ⅳ. 解除의 效果에 대한 法理構成
Ⅴ. 解除의 效果로서의 「原狀回復」 과 「損害賠償」
Ⅵ. 結論
Ⅱ. 解除制度의 沿革 및 立法例
Ⅲ. 解除의 本質 및 理論的 根據
Ⅳ. 解除의 效果에 대한 法理構成
Ⅴ. 解除의 效果로서의 「原狀回復」 과 「損害賠償」
Ⅵ. 結論
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 診療債務의 手段債務性에 대한 검토
- 사이버不法行爲에 대한 國際的 規制
- 表現法에서의 表現의 區分基準 - 독일법과 우리나라법의 비교연구
- 美國의 死刑法에 대한 硏究 - 美 聯邦大法院의 比3 原則과 매사추세츠 死刑法을 중심으로
- 協商過程의 法經濟學的 分析
- 中國法의 特徵과 法源에 關한 考察
- 辯護人의 眞實義務와 陳述拒否權 行使勸告 - 대법원 2007.1.13.자 2006모656 결정
- 近代 立憲主義 成立史 硏究 - 立憲主義의 西歐的 原型과 獨逸的 變容
- 推計課稅의 特質과 立法的 發展方向
- 우리나라 漁業用 免稅油의 WTO 補助金協定 適合性에 관한 연구
- 이스라엘의 물 管理와 水法
- 現代 法哲學에서 人間尊嚴의 문제
- 分析的 法論理學의 傳統에 대한 고찰 - 벤담, 호펠드, 캥어의 이론 비교
- 農地賣買에 있어서의 農地取得資格證明
- 刑法 제20조의 法的 意味와 違法性阻却事由로서의 正當行爲
- 게임産業振興法上 換錢業禁止條項의 意味
- 刑法規範 및 基督敎 倫理의 측면에서 본 死刑制度
- 虛僞ㆍ誇張廣告의 詐欺罪 成否 - 不動産廣告를 중심으로
- 非公式的 納稅者權利救濟制度 - 國稅廳 自體 內部檢證制度를 中心으로
- 契約解除의 本質 및 效果
- 獨逸 大學의 成立 課程과 獨逸 大學에서 自由, 自治, 그리고 改革
- 宇宙損害 賠償法의 制定背景과 主要論点
- 獨占規制法上 合意推定 관련 審(判)決例 硏究
- 督促節次의 改善에 관한 약간의 검토
- 大韓國 國制
- 不法文化財 返還에 관한 國際協約과 國內法的 履行
- 國家機關의 强壓에 의한 財産獻納의 效力에 관한 判例 考察
- 離婚法의 歷史的 展開 - 韓國과 獨逸의 경우를 비교하여
- 腐敗犯罪의 原因과 對策
- 勞使關係 先進化 立法에 대한 法理的 검토
- 법학논문집 투고 요령 외
- 都市環境整備事業에서 施行者와 事業節次의 特殊性
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!