학술논문
생명권의 헌법상 제한원리
이용수 290
- 영문명
- Constitutional Issues on Restriction of Right to Life
- 발행기관
- 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 저자명
- 최두훈(Choi Doo-Hoon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第30輯 第1號, 243~269쪽, 전체 27쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.08.30
6,040원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
What is mankind, and what is the essence of life? These may be the unsolved mystery that mankind has faced ever since humans first roamed the earth. Discussions on brain death and organ transplants, and recent developments in biotechnology have considerably changed the way we viewed mankind in the past. But regardless of how we view it today, the minimum biological requirement for existence remains unchanged: recognizing the need for existence and protection. The law cannot have the final word on human lives. Instead, an earnest effort should be made to consider when protection of life begins and when it is abandoned. Human cloning raises this issue.
This study discusses the legal problems that arise with respect to Right to Life, human cloning, particularly the issues regarding cloning human embryos.
The numerous discussions concerning human cloning may be of little significance in some aspects. A legal consideration needs to be based on solid facts for it to be precise, which is why it is often the case where a legal discussion in the past tends to lose color amid the ever-changing reality of biotechnology. Nonetheless, debates on human cloning should start with questions, such as "When does a human life begin?" "What constitutional meaning does human dignity have?" "What legal status does human dignity have with respect to human cloning?" and "What legal rights does a human embryo have?" Beginning with these questions, this thesis discusses in detail whether human cloning will be permitted under the current legal system, and if so, on what grounds and how far it should be permitted.
human dignity with regard to human cloning. An inquiry into when a human life is perceived to begin will be made in order to examine the legal status of the human embryo, and whether an embryo can be perceived as a human being, and if so, what constitutional rights would an embryo have.
If the study of human embryos recognizes the embryo as the start of human existence and as the legal subject that possesses dignity and value as a human being, a violation of an embryo"s rights is inevitable. Should an embryo be recognized as a person with basic rights and thus ban all studies on embryos, or could it be recognized as having basic rights but be interpreted differently from a person? These are the questions that are discussed along with legal issues surrounding human cloning.
This study discusses the legal problems that arise with respect to Right to Life, human cloning, particularly the issues regarding cloning human embryos.
The numerous discussions concerning human cloning may be of little significance in some aspects. A legal consideration needs to be based on solid facts for it to be precise, which is why it is often the case where a legal discussion in the past tends to lose color amid the ever-changing reality of biotechnology. Nonetheless, debates on human cloning should start with questions, such as "When does a human life begin?" "What constitutional meaning does human dignity have?" "What legal status does human dignity have with respect to human cloning?" and "What legal rights does a human embryo have?" Beginning with these questions, this thesis discusses in detail whether human cloning will be permitted under the current legal system, and if so, on what grounds and how far it should be permitted.
human dignity with regard to human cloning. An inquiry into when a human life is perceived to begin will be made in order to examine the legal status of the human embryo, and whether an embryo can be perceived as a human being, and if so, what constitutional rights would an embryo have.
If the study of human embryos recognizes the embryo as the start of human existence and as the legal subject that possesses dignity and value as a human being, a violation of an embryo"s rights is inevitable. Should an embryo be recognized as a person with basic rights and thus ban all studies on embryos, or could it be recognized as having basic rights but be interpreted differently from a person? These are the questions that are discussed along with legal issues surrounding human cloning.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 생명권의 제한논란의 전통적 구조
Ⅲ. 생명권의 제한원리
Ⅳ. 인간배아의 생명권
Ⅴ. 맺는말
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 생명권의 제한논란의 전통적 구조
Ⅲ. 생명권의 제한원리
Ⅳ. 인간배아의 생명권
Ⅴ. 맺는말
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 점유취득시효요건으로서의 등기
- 온라인 환경에서의 음악저작물 보호와 강제허락 - 소리바다사건과 미국의 Napster, Grokster 사건의 비교
- 國家에 의한 藝術支援의 法的 問題點
- 제3자를 위한 계약에서 보상관계 및 대가관계 - 대상판결: 대법원 2003.12.11. 선고 2003다49771 판결
- 스포츠 법의 현황과 과제
- 문화예술교육지원법의 제정취지와 구성
- 環境正義論에 관한 연구
- 經營判斷의 原則
- 부당염매의 위법성 판단기준에 관한 소고 - 대법원의 견해에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로
- 국내실향민의 법적 보호와 국가책임
- 생명권의 헌법상 제한원리
- 문화예술법제의 현황과 과제
- 중앙대학교 법학연구소 문화예술법센터 “문화예술과 법” 세미나 외
- 判例에 나타난 言論社間 表現行爲의 許容範圍와 限界
- 영업비밀의 쟁점 및 효과적 보호방안에 대한 검토
- 刊行辭
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!