유죄답변협상제도의 도입에 대한 비판적 검토 - 피해자의 관점에서 제기하는 반론

• 영문명: A Critical study on the introduction of the Plea Bargaining
• 발행기관: 한국형사법학회
• 저자명: 이용식(Lee. Yong-Sik)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사법연구』형사법연구 제31권, 207~228쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.06.30

영문 초록

  Recently, There are a lively discussion on the introduction of the plea bargaining in Korea. It is the question at issue. But Many problems are immanent in the introduction of the plea bargaining systern, This critical stand sterns from the traditional notion that criminal justice can only be carried out by the trial and base on the critical mind that the victim is neglected in the process of the plea bargaining.
  However the consenting party to the introduction of the plea bargaining system claim that we need to do something to enhance the efficiency of the new criminal system which will be enforced on and after January 1. 2008 and it should be efficient by a way of unloading the burden from the shoulders of the new criminal systern. But, on the contrary, this efficiency infringes on the essential meaning of the new iurv system to be named <the trial by "the people">. Like a case of the United States in which 95% criminal cases are solved by the plea bargaining, the serious dependence on the plea bargaining endanger the real substance of the jury system. Because it infringes on the right to be judged by a jury,
  Above all, it cannot be justified that the plea bargaining is carried out only between the prosecutor and the accused. Because it makes the worse the condition of the victim"s alienation in the criminal procedure.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설 - 유죄답변협상제도의 도입논의에 있어서 범죄피해자에 대한 인식의 필요성
Ⅱ. 유죄답변협상제도의 의미와 도입논의의 문제점
Ⅲ. 형사소송절차에서의 피해자의 소외현상에 대한 분석
Ⅳ. 형사절차에서 피해자의 소외현상을 해소하기 위한 선결과제
Ⅴ. 결론 - 유죄답변협상을 전제로 한 국민참여재판이라면…
〈Abstract〉

키워드

유죄답변현상제도 배심제 국민참여재판 피해자의 재판상 진술권 피해자의 사법참여 Plea Bargaining Arraignment the victim