학술논문
‘총체성’과 문화연구의 미래 - 프레드릭 제임슨의 신 광 현주제에 의한 변주
이용수 586
- 영문명
- "Totality" and the Future of Cultural Studies
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- 신광현(Shynne Gwanghyun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제11권 제2호, 49~78쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.12.01
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper attempts to show that the future of cultural studies depends on the way in which the concept of totality is incorporated in their practices, arguing that cultural studies need to establish the legitimacy of the concept of totality in order to come to terms with the global capitalist system. As an attempt to recuperate "totality" in cultural studies, this paper considers Fredric Jameson"s Marxist hermeneutics, which involves or indeed is predicated on the idea of totality that is arguably the most exhaustive and relentless one in recent theoretical debates.
After providing a survey of various concepts of totality extended by such theorists as Louis Althusser, Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Antony Easthope and Stuart Hall, this paper takes a more detailed look at Jameson"s own concept. More specifically, this paper examines two aspects of Jameson"s theory of totality, discussing his idea of the negativity of totality and his view on the relationship between subject and totality.
Jameson"s idea of the negativity of totality, despite its usefulness in defending the concept of totality from post-structuralist attacks, leads to the view that the totality is beyond a cultural representation. As a result, his idea of negative totality ends up with a preemptive view of culture, theorizing it as being able to grasp the totality only symptomatically, that is only in its failure to do so. In critiquing Jameson"s idea of the negativity of totality, this paper compares it with Georg Luk?cs"s idea of "approximation," which dislodges itself from any kind of positive view of totality yet still approves and even invites tantalizingly more and more artistic representations of totality. This paper also critiques Jameson"s reluctance to theorize the multiple strands and layers of experience that the subject employs when engaged with the totality. By examining the way Jameson uses Jean-Paul Sartre"s text, Search for a Method, this paper illustrates how he is not familiar with respecting the language of subject as much as the language of totality in spite of his claim that Marxism has both as two complimentary codes.
After providing a survey of various concepts of totality extended by such theorists as Louis Althusser, Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Antony Easthope and Stuart Hall, this paper takes a more detailed look at Jameson"s own concept. More specifically, this paper examines two aspects of Jameson"s theory of totality, discussing his idea of the negativity of totality and his view on the relationship between subject and totality.
Jameson"s idea of the negativity of totality, despite its usefulness in defending the concept of totality from post-structuralist attacks, leads to the view that the totality is beyond a cultural representation. As a result, his idea of negative totality ends up with a preemptive view of culture, theorizing it as being able to grasp the totality only symptomatically, that is only in its failure to do so. In critiquing Jameson"s idea of the negativity of totality, this paper compares it with Georg Luk?cs"s idea of "approximation," which dislodges itself from any kind of positive view of totality yet still approves and even invites tantalizingly more and more artistic representations of totality. This paper also critiques Jameson"s reluctance to theorize the multiple strands and layers of experience that the subject employs when engaged with the totality. By examining the way Jameson uses Jean-Paul Sartre"s text, Search for a Method, this paper illustrates how he is not familiar with respecting the language of subject as much as the language of totality in spite of his claim that Marxism has both as two complimentary codes.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 총체성에 관한 이론의 흐름
3. 총체성의 부정성
4. 총체성과 주체
5. 맺는 말
인용 문헌
Abstract
2. 총체성에 관한 이론의 흐름
3. 총체성의 부정성
4. 총체성과 주체
5. 맺는 말
인용 문헌
Abstract
해당간행물 수록 논문
- ‘근대문학’ 이후의 ‘문학’(연구)?
- 이론과 문화연구 - 양자의 갈등과 한국영문학의 좌표
- Modernism Revisited via Bürger's Theory of the Avant-Garde
- 라캉의 과학 개념과 비평적 주체의 복권
- 레비나스의 ‘있음’과 ‘고독’ 그리고 콜리지의 『노수부의 노래』 읽기
- 바디우와 베케트: ‘사건’의 주체와 시적 명명의 문학 - 『최악의 방향을 향하여』 를 중심으로
- ‘총체성’과 문화연구의 미래 - 프레드릭 제임슨의 신 광 현주제에 의한 변주
- 헤겔, 데리다, 이리가레의 안티고네
- 〈투고 안내〉외
- 드 만과 데리다 - 허무의 유희와 포월(包越)의 광기
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!