학술논문
북송시대 文의 부활과 불교의 과제
이용수 148
- 영문명
- The Renaissance of Wen and the Problem of Buddhism in North Song
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 주성옥(Chu Song-Ok)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제14호, 35~59쪽, 전체 25쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.08.30
5,800원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Against our generally accepted idea that Buddhism was declined in Song, Buddhism was developed. But from middle Tang, Chinese society had changed great deal in politics, economy, and culture. Office-literati in North Song endeavored to restore Chinese culture. The revival of Wen (文, culture) is characterized by returning to Chinese original value, but there were two different models of Wen. One is the tendency of literary refinement which had started from Tang. The leader of this group was Yang-yi, a poet of Xi-gun-pa (西崑派). The other was proposed by moralists, especially neo-Confucians who regarded the ancient Confucianism as a single value.
It is interesting that their different model of Wen were correspondent with their attitude toward Buddhism. The first group thought Buddhism was useful to make Confucian identity and able to enrich Confucian culture, but the second group thought that the establishment of new Confucianism made way against Buddhism. So there were two tasks in Buddhist community in North Song in order to adapt itself to the changed society. One was to overcome the negative opinions against Buddhism and the other was to present new values which would be appropriate to the secularconfucian society.
There also were some monks who made their best to restore Wen. They represented the trend that made Buddhism be in harmony with Confucianism. They are 贊寧(Zan-ning), 智圓(Zhiyuan), 契嵩(Xie-song). They tried to prove that Buddhism is not only one of Chinese tradition, but also useful to the reign of emperor. They insisted that Buddhism and Confucianism is identical and have the same educational effect on people. But they failed to persuade Confucian because they emphasized much the similarity between Buddhism and Confucianism and the political efficacy of Buddhism, so that they blurred out its own characteristics.
But from the point of view which emphasized the diversity of culture, Buddhism was approved as a kind of Chinese culture. Chan Buddhism appealed to office-literati who were more tolerant, because it did not claim to be a legitimate factor of Chinese culture but emphasized its special origin and inherits. In fact it contributed to the restoration of Wen not by the way of integration but by the way of extending the contents of Chinese culture. So it had much influence on Chinese literature and arts. The critique on Buddhism in Song for its secularization is not proper.
It is interesting that their different model of Wen were correspondent with their attitude toward Buddhism. The first group thought Buddhism was useful to make Confucian identity and able to enrich Confucian culture, but the second group thought that the establishment of new Confucianism made way against Buddhism. So there were two tasks in Buddhist community in North Song in order to adapt itself to the changed society. One was to overcome the negative opinions against Buddhism and the other was to present new values which would be appropriate to the secularconfucian society.
There also were some monks who made their best to restore Wen. They represented the trend that made Buddhism be in harmony with Confucianism. They are 贊寧(Zan-ning), 智圓(Zhiyuan), 契嵩(Xie-song). They tried to prove that Buddhism is not only one of Chinese tradition, but also useful to the reign of emperor. They insisted that Buddhism and Confucianism is identical and have the same educational effect on people. But they failed to persuade Confucian because they emphasized much the similarity between Buddhism and Confucianism and the political efficacy of Buddhism, so that they blurred out its own characteristics.
But from the point of view which emphasized the diversity of culture, Buddhism was approved as a kind of Chinese culture. Chan Buddhism appealed to office-literati who were more tolerant, because it did not claim to be a legitimate factor of Chinese culture but emphasized its special origin and inherits. In fact it contributed to the restoration of Wen not by the way of integration but by the way of extending the contents of Chinese culture. So it had much influence on Chinese literature and arts. The critique on Buddhism in Song for its secularization is not proper.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 사대부의 문에 대한 태도와 불교에 대한 태도의 연관성
Ⅲ. 문의 부흥에 대한 불교의 대응
Ⅳ. 불교의 대응이 갖는 정치적 성격과 文
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
영문초록
Ⅱ. 사대부의 문에 대한 태도와 불교에 대한 태도의 연관성
Ⅲ. 문의 부흥에 대한 불교의 대응
Ⅳ. 불교의 대응이 갖는 정치적 성격과 文
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!