학술논문
공연 중심의 셰익스피어 극 교육론 - 쟁점과 대안
이용수 94
- 영문명
- Shakespeare Performance Pedagogy: Issues and Alternatives
- 발행기관
- 한국영미문학교육학회
- 저자명
- 김문기(Moonki Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『영미문학교육』영미문학교육 제10집 1호, 5~24쪽, 전체 20쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.06.01
5,200원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Performance-centered Shakespeare education has recently emerged as a significant alternative to text-based Shakespeare education in an effort to overcome the crisis of Shakespeare education. This paper examines the theoretical background of Shakespeare performance pedagogy and issues related to its application to the classroom, while searching for the possible alternatives that can be corrective to some of the problems current Shakespeare performance pedagogy exposes. This paper would also like to suggest that the potential of performance pedagogy could be fully realized only when the performance itself is not the sole purpose of Shakespeare performance pedagogy.
During the 1970s, Shakespeare performance criticism emerged as a "revolutionary" research field by a group of Anglo-American scholars who insisted that Shakespeare wrote playscripts whose potential meanings could be best realized in theatrical performance. This new trend in Shakespeare studies soon influenced Shakespeare pedagogy enormously. By 1984 performance pedagogy became not only universally accepted but also regarded as a ‘correct’ way to teach Shakespearean drama. Proliferation of the publication of performance-oriented textbooks and audio-visual materials helped teachers incorporate performative aspects into their classroom.
However, Shakespeare performance criticism and thus Shakespeare performance pedagogy based their theory on the seriously misconceived conception on the relationship between text and performance. Despite its interest in stage performance of the text and its theatrical conventions and history, the real motivation of performance pedagogy was to recover the primacy of Shakespearean language in performance. This logocentric attitude toward the relationship between text and performance falsely assumes that the function of theatrical performance is realization of the text"s authentic commands and recovery of meaning intrinsic to the text. Theatrical performance is more than a visual interpretation of a written text. It is a special place where stage and text encounter in their specific materiality and historicity. Logocentric assumption of performance pedagogy tends to read Shakespeare"s texts as apolitical texts, foregrounding their universal values and poetic language while ignoring historical, material, and cultural conditions surrounding their original and subsequent productions.
An alternative to this logocentric and apolitical performance pedagogy has to reconsider the relationship between teacher and students and the nature of Shakespearean text, along with more detailed discussions on developing specific pedagogical methods reflecting these reconsiderations. In order to teach Shakespeare in a way that introduces historical contingency, textual instability, and plurality of meaning, a reconfiguration of the role of teachers and students is fundamental. Teachers should function as a kind of provocateurs and mediators, working with their students, in their collaborative efforts to construct meanings of Shakespeare. Understanding that the text we now study is an imperfect, variant text, subject to history and existing in many forms and media, and that Shakespeare plays have an intrinsically open structure that can generate multiple, even contradictory, meanings and forms empowers students and thus encourages them to be active participants rather than passive consumers in creating Shakespearean meanings.
This new understanding of the nature of Shakespearean text and relationship between teachers and students eventually put the emphasis on the rehearsal process rather than on the end product itself. Through the emphasis on the rehearsal in which trials and errors are allowed and even encouraged and various, even conflicting interpretations could be made, students will deeply understand the relationship between text and performance and be con
During the 1970s, Shakespeare performance criticism emerged as a "revolutionary" research field by a group of Anglo-American scholars who insisted that Shakespeare wrote playscripts whose potential meanings could be best realized in theatrical performance. This new trend in Shakespeare studies soon influenced Shakespeare pedagogy enormously. By 1984 performance pedagogy became not only universally accepted but also regarded as a ‘correct’ way to teach Shakespearean drama. Proliferation of the publication of performance-oriented textbooks and audio-visual materials helped teachers incorporate performative aspects into their classroom.
However, Shakespeare performance criticism and thus Shakespeare performance pedagogy based their theory on the seriously misconceived conception on the relationship between text and performance. Despite its interest in stage performance of the text and its theatrical conventions and history, the real motivation of performance pedagogy was to recover the primacy of Shakespearean language in performance. This logocentric attitude toward the relationship between text and performance falsely assumes that the function of theatrical performance is realization of the text"s authentic commands and recovery of meaning intrinsic to the text. Theatrical performance is more than a visual interpretation of a written text. It is a special place where stage and text encounter in their specific materiality and historicity. Logocentric assumption of performance pedagogy tends to read Shakespeare"s texts as apolitical texts, foregrounding their universal values and poetic language while ignoring historical, material, and cultural conditions surrounding their original and subsequent productions.
An alternative to this logocentric and apolitical performance pedagogy has to reconsider the relationship between teacher and students and the nature of Shakespearean text, along with more detailed discussions on developing specific pedagogical methods reflecting these reconsiderations. In order to teach Shakespeare in a way that introduces historical contingency, textual instability, and plurality of meaning, a reconfiguration of the role of teachers and students is fundamental. Teachers should function as a kind of provocateurs and mediators, working with their students, in their collaborative efforts to construct meanings of Shakespeare. Understanding that the text we now study is an imperfect, variant text, subject to history and existing in many forms and media, and that Shakespeare plays have an intrinsically open structure that can generate multiple, even contradictory, meanings and forms empowers students and thus encourages them to be active participants rather than passive consumers in creating Shakespearean meanings.
This new understanding of the nature of Shakespearean text and relationship between teachers and students eventually put the emphasis on the rehearsal process rather than on the end product itself. Through the emphasis on the rehearsal in which trials and errors are allowed and even encouraged and various, even conflicting interpretations could be made, students will deeply understand the relationship between text and performance and be con
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
Ⅱ. 본론
Ⅲ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- ‘이론 이후’의 문학에 어떤 희망이 가능한가?
- 영문학 교육의 새 방향―문화교육
- 공연 중심의 셰익스피어 극 교육론 - 쟁점과 대안
- Dynamics of Foucault"s Subjectivity - The Enlightenment and His Ethos
- 10-1호 필자 정보 및 게재논문 심사 경과 외
- 『햄릿』 교수법, Approaches to Teaching Shakespeare"s Hamlet. Edited by Bernice W. Kliman. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2002. Pp. xiv + 291.
- 공연 교수법을 통한 영미드라마 가르치기
- 현대희곡과 소수적 감성 - 커리큘럼의 현황과 문제점, 작품선택의 정치학
- A Whole New Marriage of Mind and Matter - D. H. Lawrence and Modernism
- 영어교육전공 대학생을 위한 영시 수업 - 학습자 특성을 고려한 시 제시
- 『제철공장에서의 삶』 - 중산계급 여성 화자의 역할
- 문화연구로 영미드라마 가르치기 - 텍스트/공연, 고급/대중예술의 이분법을 넘어서
- 대학의 ‘그리스 항아리’
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!