학술논문
논술 학습 프로세스 리엔지니어링 - 비판적 사고와 논증구조화를 중심으로
이용수 119
- 영문명
- Writing-Learning Process Reengineering ―Based on the critical thinking and the structuralization of argument―
- 발행기관
- 한국어문교육학회
- 저자명
- 정재형(Jeong Jae-hyeong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『어문학교육』어문학교육 제33집, 193~231쪽, 전체 39쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 한국어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.11.01
7,480원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
‘Writing’, one of expression educations, takes a position in the general writing educations. Based on the educational objective of writing subject for higher elementary students, this study adds a frame of educational technology to it. ‘Writing-Learning Process Reengineering’ is a strategy for efficient writing and writing expression education.
‘Writing-Learning Process Reengineering’ means the writing learning strategy that redesigns the existing incorrect habits or methods of writing learning and renovates them. Notice that here the process means a variety of procedures for a sort of problem-solving and includes a kind of ‘problem-discovering’and the structure of ‘problem-solving’.
〈Figure〉 The interlocking structure of Writing-Learning Process Reengineering
Input process ⇒ Transformation process ⇒ Output process
In this system for thought of writing-learning, there are criteria to enhance the effect of learning at each stage. First, the content for argument should be clear. Then, the frame of the argument should be also definite and its application should be valid.
In this reengineering, a so-called ‘Action Debate Learning (ADL)’ is pursued. It is for solving actual problems in hand rather than the existing contents or theories of writing subject through discussions. That is, this process purposes that learners seek for reading materials that the points of their arguments are clear, controversial and appropriate to learner’s level and question about the arguments and ultimately have them solve and internalize the methods of problem-solving for themselves.
In addition, it considers the education of logical understanding and expression in order for learners to write efficient writing. For these considerations, it is required that the features of logic be understood and logical relationships in contexts be learned with linking words. Besides this, ‘the structure of argument’ should be developed for problem-solving based on especially ‘main issue’ of the structure of ‘an introduction-main issue-conclusion’. Therefore, efficient problem-solving is attempted through a variety of supporting systems such as ‘teaching-based support’, ‘teaching-adaptation support’ and ‘recheck support’, etc.
‘Writing-Learning Process Reengineering’ means the writing learning strategy that redesigns the existing incorrect habits or methods of writing learning and renovates them. Notice that here the process means a variety of procedures for a sort of problem-solving and includes a kind of ‘problem-discovering’and the structure of ‘problem-solving’.
〈Figure〉 The interlocking structure of Writing-Learning Process Reengineering
Input process ⇒ Transformation process ⇒ Output process
In this system for thought of writing-learning, there are criteria to enhance the effect of learning at each stage. First, the content for argument should be clear. Then, the frame of the argument should be also definite and its application should be valid.
In this reengineering, a so-called ‘Action Debate Learning (ADL)’ is pursued. It is for solving actual problems in hand rather than the existing contents or theories of writing subject through discussions. That is, this process purposes that learners seek for reading materials that the points of their arguments are clear, controversial and appropriate to learner’s level and question about the arguments and ultimately have them solve and internalize the methods of problem-solving for themselves.
In addition, it considers the education of logical understanding and expression in order for learners to write efficient writing. For these considerations, it is required that the features of logic be understood and logical relationships in contexts be learned with linking words. Besides this, ‘the structure of argument’ should be developed for problem-solving based on especially ‘main issue’ of the structure of ‘an introduction-main issue-conclusion’. Therefore, efficient problem-solving is attempted through a variety of supporting systems such as ‘teaching-based support’, ‘teaching-adaptation support’ and ‘recheck support’, etc.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 비판적 사고를 통한 논증의 뼈대 갖추기
3. 논증구조화와 논술문 쓰기
4. 마무리
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
2. 비판적 사고를 통한 논증의 뼈대 갖추기
3. 논증구조화와 논술문 쓰기
4. 마무리
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 텍스트 중심 말하기 교육 내용 구성의 전제와 함축
- 초등 말하기 수업의 내용과 방법
- 비유적 표현을 통한 시 쓰기 지도 연구
- 쓰기 교수행위의 예술적 의미
- 즉흥극을 활용한 동화지도 연구
- 국어과 쓰기 평가 문항 작성의 실태와 개선 방안
- 비문법적인 문장 분석을 통한 올바른 문장 지도 방안에 대한 연구
- 논술 학습 프로세스 리엔지니어링 - 비판적 사고와 논증구조화를 중심으로
- 시의 구성요소에 따른 낭송 활동 중심의 시 교육 연구
- 휘보 외
- 국어 표현 교육의 방향 - 과정 중심 글쓰기 교육을 중심으로
- 국어과 교수ㆍ학습 모형 개발을 통한 상호작용성 증진 연구
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 한국어와문학분야 BEST
- 국어의 줄임말 현상에 따른 언어변이 양상과 문제점
- ‘밈(meme)’을 활용한 고전문학과 문화콘텐츠의 상호 협력과 융복합교육
- 연구 동향 분석을 통해 본 학문 목적 한국어교육 연구의 실태와 제언
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!