학술논문
교육에서 온정주의적 간섭과 자유의 문제
이용수 132
- 영문명
- Paternalistic Intervention and Liberty in Education
- 발행기관
- 한국교육철학회
- 저자명
- 정호표(Chung Ho-Pyo)
- 간행물 정보
- 『교육철학』敎育哲學 第29集, 119~135쪽, 전체 17쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 교육학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.08.01
4,840원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
We must respect children"s liberty in educational practices so that children can obtain the abilities for exercise of liberty and realize their rational life plans in future. In this respect, children"s liberty in education is regarded as contributing to the acquisition of social competencies by socialization and development of autonomy. In short, children can elevate the worth of liberty and autonomous choice by schooling.
But in schooling, if restrictions of children"s liberty can enlarge the worth of liberty and conditions for exercise of liberty in future lives, it may be justified by the general priciple of liberty. As rights of liberty must not conflict with other goods such as respect for others" interests, equality, and rationality in practical discourse, so children"s rights of liberty in educational activities must be compatible with other educational values. And the limitations of children"s liberty in education must be based on the justification rule of freedom and on the educational justification. In fact, because of the individual differences of educational achievements and the alteration of general good, we cannot regard the principle of general good as a good criterion of paternalistic intervention. We must highly evaluate the long-term interests of children and future opportunities rather than immediate desire, short-term happiness, and present interests of children.
In short, we can choose one educational policy between paternalistic intervention for developing future autonomy and the exercise of children"s liberty necessary to the choosing actiivities in educational practices. But the rational policy for children"s liberty cannot be determined by general principle or one policy. It is an empirical and individual problem.
But in schooling, if restrictions of children"s liberty can enlarge the worth of liberty and conditions for exercise of liberty in future lives, it may be justified by the general priciple of liberty. As rights of liberty must not conflict with other goods such as respect for others" interests, equality, and rationality in practical discourse, so children"s rights of liberty in educational activities must be compatible with other educational values. And the limitations of children"s liberty in education must be based on the justification rule of freedom and on the educational justification. In fact, because of the individual differences of educational achievements and the alteration of general good, we cannot regard the principle of general good as a good criterion of paternalistic intervention. We must highly evaluate the long-term interests of children and future opportunities rather than immediate desire, short-term happiness, and present interests of children.
In short, we can choose one educational policy between paternalistic intervention for developing future autonomy and the exercise of children"s liberty necessary to the choosing actiivities in educational practices. But the rational policy for children"s liberty cannot be determined by general principle or one policy. It is an empirical and individual problem.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 교육과 자유개념
Ⅲ. 교육활동에서 아동의 자유
Ⅳ. 온정주의적 간섭의 문제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 교육과 자유개념
Ⅲ. 교육활동에서 아동의 자유
Ⅳ. 온정주의적 간섭의 문제
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 교육학분야 NEW
- 초등학교 고학년 대상 마음챙김에 기반한 정서능력 향상 프로그램 개발 및 효과
- 범죄피해 외상경험자를 위한 가드닝 마음챙김 집단상담 프로그램 개발의 예비연구
- 실패마인드셋 척도(The Failure Mindset Scale: FMS)의 개발과 타당화
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!