학술논문
‘計劃婚姻’의 法的 評價 - 夫婦契約의 拘束力 -
이용수 45
- 영문명
- Legal Valuation of Individually Tailored Marriages
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 최진섭(Jin-Sub Choi)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』가족법연구 제18권 2호, 53~83쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.09.01
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Premarital agreements might specify the terms of marriage and divorce, including provisions dealing with the distribution of property, custody of children, and perhaps what behavior is permitted the parties after divorce. In the past, social norms defined a “marriage” and the gender roles within a marriage. The law did not allow contractual variations out of keeping with the social norms. As a matter of public policy, it was thought that the interests of society required the fostering of a certain type of marriage, in the interests of child rearing and stability, and the desires of the individual needed to be subordinated to social order. Thus, social norms and legal doctrine prevented people from entering into a premarital agreement.
Although still limited, a marriage today is considered much more a matter for the two parties concerned, not for society, to structure. Yet few people entering their first marriage memorialize their shared understandings, obligations, and aspirations by contract. The rarity of individualized contracts is partially explained by inertia and partly by lack of awareness that being bound by premarital contracts can be a good thing for both parties. Another reason is that no one can be sure that courts will enforce the contracts. The law has not kept pace with societal sensibilities. The freedom valued by society and offered by expanded social norms is not enabled by the law.
Moreover, social norms and families have become weaker. With nonlegal constraints weakening, people need legal institutions to pick up the slack, allowing them to make credible commitments to each other. It is time for legislators and judges to clarify to what extent courts will enforce premarital agreements.
The center of the divorce-law discussion relates to what should be the best rules for custody of children and allocation of marital assets or future income. Many scholars raise the controversy up a level, arguing that one theory or another should be used in deciding how to reform the law of marriage. At either level, the argument assumes that we as a society need to decide what is best for people. The problem is that the debate regarding whether society or couples should decide what is best for couples has not been resolved satisfactorily.
The legal system should increase private choice in marriage and divorce law. What is essential is that legislatures recognize that people need to be able to commit themselves to each other by judicially enforceable agreements. Statutes could usefully provide forms with several enforceable and reliable options.
The law does not need to provide enforcement for every possible kind of marriage, but it should provide clear and dependable enforcement for a few kinds. In the interests of individual autonomy, self-control, and elf-realization, in the interests of privacy and efficiency, couples ought to be allowed to structure their lives as they wish.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 부부간의 계약의 유형과 그 구속력
Ⅲ. 결 론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 법정상속인에 대한 재검토
- 부 록
- 헌법, 국제사법 그리고 가족법 - 독일 학설, 판례 및 입법의 변화와 우리 국제사법의 현 위치 -
- 發刊辭
- 건강가정기본법에 대한 고찰
- ‘計劃婚姻’의 法的 評價 - 夫婦契約의 拘束力 -
- 재산분할에 있어서 소극재산이 적극재산을 초과하는 경우
- 혼인의 무효, 취소규정의 정비를 위한 검토
- 후견인의 요양·감호의무에 관한 고찰 - 개정전 일본 민법의 해석론과 성년후견을 중심으로 -
- 高齡者의 後見制度와 自己決定權
- 상속회복청구권의 시효에 관한 일제시대 관습법의 정립과 왜곡
- 공동상속인의 부양·간병행위로서의 기여분 대법원 1998. 12. 8 선고 97므513·520, 97스12판결 : 판례공보(1999. 1. 15)
- 국제학회 참가기 국제가족법학회 북경지역 학술대회
- 財産分割로 인한 債務의 承繼
- 가사소송절차의 문제점과 개선방향
- 家事訴訟上 當事者의 變更
- 가사비송절차의 문제점과 개선방향
- 仁山 郭東憲 敎授 年譜
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!