학술논문
법정상속인에 대한 재검토
이용수 64
- 영문명
- Reexamination of the Legal Descent
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 이은정(Eun-Jung Lee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』가족법연구 제18권 2호, 225~258쪽, 전체 34쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.09.01
6,880원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This article reexamines the legal regulations regarding successorship in the civil law that require amendment, considering diverse views on the basis of succession. The summary of recommended amendments on the legal heir is shown below. First of all, the first priority of lineal descent should be limited to sons and daughters, and succession by lineal descendants as far as and beyond grandchildren should be revised to succession by representation. As for succession by representation, when considering the range of heirs, succession by representation of the children’s direct descendents should be limited to within cousins. Lineal ascendant should be limited to grandparents, and the priority of inheritance should differ among parents and grandparents, so parents should have the second priority of inheritance and grandparents should have the third priority along with siblings of the deceased. Also considering the obligation of mature children to support the parents, parents who have no children except for the deceased, should have the opportunity to inherit with children of the deceased. However, considering the basic principles of inheritance that lineal descendants have the priority over lineal ascendants, the amount of inheritance can be different between children and parents of the deceased.
In case of foster parents and foster children, when lineal ascendants like parents or collateral kinship are legal heirs, it is correct in the light of the principle of equity in succession law to classify them according to real family or adaptive family, and then allow each half of the inheritance. In case of siblings, they should be treated differently in inheritance depending on whether they have same parents or different mother or father. As for the right of succession by representation by lineal descendents of siblings, it should be limited to the children of siblings. The range of collateral kinship except bothers and sisters as the legal heir, should be limited to the first cousin, and considering the present form of families, it should be limited to lineal descendants of grandparents.
Therefore, the order of inheritance of the legal heir is the following: The first priority are children of the deceased, and parents who have no children except for the deceased. The second priority are parents of the deceased, the third are grandparents and siblings of the deceased, and the fourth are collateral kinship limited to first cousins. But in the fourth priority, collateral kinship should be limited to lineal descendant of grandparents.
As for the inheritance right of a spouse, a spouse married without a marriage license, a spouse with a proceeding divorce, and a spouse with a proceeding annulment, should not have the right of inheritance. But, under the succession law that denies the system of living separately, it is inevitable to recognize the inheritance right of a spouse even if couples have actually divorced. However, a spouse, excluded in the right of inheritance, should have the right of claim for property division at the time of dissolution of a marriage come from death of the other party, instead of the inheritance right.
The amount of inheritance of a spouse should be revised for confirming the fixed amount and for reasonably increasing its amounts to the rational standard, and in case of the dissolution of a marriage come from death of the other party, it is desirable to calculate the amount of inheritance after dividing matrimonial property.
In the relationship by marriage, as the relationship between stepparents and stepsons, or between the deceased and a daughter-in-law of the deceased, the relatives by marriage should not have the right of inheritance. However, in special cases, for instance when they need support for living expenses, succession law should be revised so that they could claim some amounts for contribution or use distribution system for special relatives.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 법정상속인에 관한 입법례
Ⅲ. 혈 족
Ⅳ. 배우자
Ⅴ. 인 척
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 법정상속인에 대한 재검토
- 부 록
- 헌법, 국제사법 그리고 가족법 - 독일 학설, 판례 및 입법의 변화와 우리 국제사법의 현 위치 -
- 發刊辭
- 건강가정기본법에 대한 고찰
- ‘計劃婚姻’의 法的 評價 - 夫婦契約의 拘束力 -
- 재산분할에 있어서 소극재산이 적극재산을 초과하는 경우
- 혼인의 무효, 취소규정의 정비를 위한 검토
- 후견인의 요양·감호의무에 관한 고찰 - 개정전 일본 민법의 해석론과 성년후견을 중심으로 -
- 高齡者의 後見制度와 自己決定權
- 상속회복청구권의 시효에 관한 일제시대 관습법의 정립과 왜곡
- 공동상속인의 부양·간병행위로서의 기여분 대법원 1998. 12. 8 선고 97므513·520, 97스12판결 : 판례공보(1999. 1. 15)
- 국제학회 참가기 국제가족법학회 북경지역 학술대회
- 財産分割로 인한 債務의 承繼
- 가사소송절차의 문제점과 개선방향
- 家事訴訟上 當事者의 變更
- 가사비송절차의 문제점과 개선방향
- 仁山 郭東憲 敎授 年譜
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!