학술논문
상가건물임차인의 계약갱신요구권
이용수 179
- 영문명
- Business Tenant s Right to a New Lease
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 이은희(Lee, Eun-Hee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제26호, 113~142쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.09.30
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
A landlord may be in a position to charge a far higher rent from the existing tenant on the renewal of the tenancy than he or she would be able to do if he or she was to let the premises to a new tenant on the open market. Parliament intervened to prevent this potential injustice by enacting the Business Tenancy Protection Act 2002. It entitled a business tenant to the right to request a new tenancy. The provisions with regard to the right to a new lease is criticised either for depriving the landlord of right to forfeit the tenancy or for not offering adequate protection to the tenant. The 2002 Act, s 10 contains the core of the security offered by the Act. The basis of this security is automatic continuation. A tenancy which falls within the Act will not come to an end by effluxion of time unless it is terminated in one of the ways set out in the Act. The methods of termination available under the 2002 Act can be divided into two categories : (i) those Civil Code methods of termination which are preserved by the Act; and (ii) the statutory methods of termination which are provided for in the Act. Under the Civil Code there are two ways in which a tenancy to which the Act applies can be brought to an end: (a) by the tenant giving notice to terminate the tenancy under Art. 635; (b) by the landlord forfeiting the tenancy in the event of the tenant breaching an obligation under the lease. Under the 2002 Act there are three ways in which a tenancy to which the Act applies can be brought to an end : (a) by the landlord giving notice to terminate the tenancy under s 10 (4); (b) by the landlord refusing reasonably a new tenancy under s 10 (1); (c) by the tenant giving notice to terminate the tenancy under s 10 (5). The second of these options is applicable where the tenant requests a new tenancy. The Business Tenancy Protection Act, s 10 (1) provides eight grounds upon which the landlord may oppose a tenant s request for a new tenancy. Where a landlord refuses a new lease under grounds 1, 4, 5, or the foregoing part of 8, the basis of the refusal is that the tenant has breached some obligation in the lease. In the case of ground 3 there is no loss to the tenant because proper compensation is provided by the landlord. Grounds 6, 7, and the latter part of 8, however, are based not on the default of the tenant but on the needs of the landlord. The tenant therefore should be given a right to compensation where the landlord has refused a new lease under any of these three grounds. The right to a new lease is not provided by the Residential Tenancy Protection Act 2002. It should be imported into the Act.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 묵시의 갱신
Ⅲ. 상가건물 임대차의 종료
Ⅳ. 계약갱신요구에 의한 갱신
Ⅴ. 갱신된 임대차
Ⅵ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- 장애인재활상담사 보수교육 운영에 관한 인식 연구: 재활관련 기관 종사자 FGI를 기반으로
- 장애인재활상담사의 직무요인과 상담 전문성, 자기효능감이 심리적 소진에 미치는 영향
- 발달장애 근로 청년의 1인 가구 자립생활 지원 욕구에 관한 연구: 장애 당사자⋅보호자⋅지원인력을 중심으로
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!