학술논문
토지거래허가와 그 효력에 대한 연구
이용수 19
- 영문명
- Study on Permission of land transaction and Effect
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 吳始暎(OH, See-Young)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제35호, 419~462쪽, 전체 44쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.03.31
8,080원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The Constitutional Court ruled Article 118 provision 1 of the Program and Utilization for National Land (previously Article 21-3 provision 1 of the Utilization and Management for National Land) to be constitutional, which requires one who shall buy or sell the land in the permission district must obtain the permission of the government and further held that the land transaction contract without such permission is absolutely ineffective. The Supreme Court, which at first held that the land transaction contract without such permission is absolutely ineffective following the Constitutional Court, changed its stance recently as to such contract is currently void. As the evaluation of judicial precedent can be made after analyzing the legal character of the permission of the Act, the theories of the legal character are as follows: first, theoretical confirmation theory; second, theoretical permission theory; third, combination of the theoretical confirmation and permission theory; forth, theoretical licence theory. The judicial precedent and the majority of the academia insist on the theoretical confirmation theory regarding the permission of the Act. Thus denying the effect of the contract and insists the effect of the land transaction contract without such permission to be currently void. But the theoretical permission theory is more appropriate and following the provisional validity theory which approves the effect of the obligatory right of the contract is reasonable. Regarding Article 118 clause 6 which states that a land transaction contract without the permission doesn t come into force, there are number of opinions in the interpretation, such as absolute invalidity theory, relative invalidity theory, validity of obligatory right theory, currently void theory and so forth are posed. The judicial precedent that insisted the currently void theory recognizes that the effect of the land transaction contract without such permission is retroactively valid starting on the date of the signing of contract, and that the currently void changes definite validity, if one gets the permission after the land transaction contract. But if the currently void theory is adopted, the validity of the obligatory right of the land transaction contract is denied absolutely, causing difficultly in legal settlement due to cancellation fee rescission, revocation provided by law, provisional registration and preservative measure of the ownership transference registration claim, damage reparation demand of default on an obligation, and breach of trust in criminal liability would be denied. Thus, as the permission of that Act is an administrative measure of an executive agency separate from the mutual agreement for the real estate transference and registration, the effect of the permission should be analyzed separatedly. As the permission of the Act is the revocation condition by law, the effect of the permission is provisionally valid until the permission of the land transaction contract is decided as a definite disapproval. Only if the effect is recognized to be provisionally valid, recognition of the cooperate motion for the permission of the land transaction contact motion, cancellation fee rescission, revocation provided by law, provisional registration and preservative measure of the ownership transference registration claim, damage reparation demand of default on an obligation, and the breach of trust in criminal liability can be used as a legal solution. Adopting the effect of the land transaction contact without permission to be provisionally valid raises some negative issues, as the achievement of the Act s goal such as the realty speculation restraint and the effective program and utilization of the national land could become difficult to achieve. B
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 토지거래 규제에 관한 법률의 변천
Ⅲ. 토지거래허가제도의 변천
Ⅳ. 토지거래계약의 허가
Ⅴ. 유동적 무효와 잠정적 유효
Ⅵ. 구체적 검토
Ⅶ. 결론 - 유동적 무효와 잠정적 유효에 대한 검토
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미국 계약법상 손해배상의 범위
- 토지거래허가와 그 효력에 대한 연구
- 교회의 교인들이 종전교단으로부터 집단적으로 탈퇴하여 별도의 교회를 설립한 경우의 법률관계
- 所有權의 構造에 關한 一考察
- 엔터테인먼트법에 대한 새로운 접근
- 不法行爲로 인한 損害賠償請求權의 長期의 期間制限의 性質과 權利濫用
- 민법 총칙편 제3장(법인) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(설립)에 관한 개정방향
- 雙方의 共通된 動機錯誤
- 영미법상 계약교섭의 결렬에 따른 책임
- 대항불능이론에 대한 고찰
- 계약의 해제와 채무자의 귀책사유
- 數人이 채권의 일부씩을 代位辨濟한 경우에 있어서의 配當順位
- UNCITRAL의 담보부거래에 관한 연구
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!