학술논문
대항불능이론에 대한 고찰
이용수 27
- 영문명
- A Study on the general theory of ‘l inopposabilité’
- 발행기관
- 한국민사법학회
- 저자명
- 정진명(Chung, Jin-Myung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사법학』제35호, 115~158쪽, 전체 44쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회과학일반
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.03.31
8,080원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Such expressions as “can not oppose , “can not hurt the right , or “can not hurt profits habe been used in Korean Civil Code, and these have been called ‘opposition factor , ‘protecting regulation of third-party in each article. But in the case of opposition factor, it is taken with legal position which the person who doesn t register should bear burden although it is not limited to the opposition matter for the change of a real right. So these regulations which limit the possibility of opposition for the right are not supposed to exclude opposition matter of public notification and, then the problem of how they are comprehended comes to be raised. The expression as “can not oppose being used in Korean Civil Code functions to make limit legal effects which have occurred from protection of third-party. Of this, there is no other theory because it has the meaning of protecting third-party and enough exchanging of profits between both parties for interests. But because each article in Korean Civil Code differs its nuance, it has caused the problem of whether the basis and structure of judging profit are based on the same meaning and principles. A the general theory of ‘l inopposabilité’ relatively takes nullity, rescission of legal behaviors to protect third-party s trust and divides effects into both parties and third-party s. So it limits occurrence of effect into internal thing and constructs not to affect on acquiring right of third-party in the case of shortage of external recognition. This kind of difference of approaching method suggests the meaning, factor, and effect theory to protect of third-party and a certain direction of appliable range. n this paper, the issue of ‘whether the expression as “can not oppose being used generally in civil law is possible for the theoric basis to deal with opposition matter which has been discussed and ‘what meaning it has in each article were researched.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 대항불능이론의 연혁
Ⅲ. 우리 민법에 있어서 대항불능이론
Ⅳ. 맺음말
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 미국 계약법상 손해배상의 범위
- 토지거래허가와 그 효력에 대한 연구
- 교회의 교인들이 종전교단으로부터 집단적으로 탈퇴하여 별도의 교회를 설립한 경우의 법률관계
- 所有權의 構造에 關한 一考察
- 엔터테인먼트법에 대한 새로운 접근
- 不法行爲로 인한 損害賠償請求權의 長期의 期間制限의 性質과 權利濫用
- 민법 총칙편 제3장(법인) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(설립)에 관한 개정방향
- 雙方의 共通된 動機錯誤
- 영미법상 계약교섭의 결렬에 따른 책임
- 대항불능이론에 대한 고찰
- 계약의 해제와 채무자의 귀책사유
- 數人이 채권의 일부씩을 代位辨濟한 경우에 있어서의 配當順位
- UNCITRAL의 담보부거래에 관한 연구
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 BEST
더보기사회과학 > 사회과학일반분야 NEW
- The Current Situation, Problems and Solutions of China's Basic Legal System of Digital Economy under the Background of Global Digital Governance
- Persistence and Breakthrough: Opportunities, Missions and Challenges of School Sports Development Under the “Double Reduction” Policy
- Research on the Issue of Chinese Youth Subculture Group in the Phenomenon of “Economic Fever”
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!