본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

정신건강복지법 비판

이용수 462

영문명
Critique of Mental Health Welfare Law in Korea : Focusing on Involuntary Hospitalization Criteria
발행기관
대한신경정신의학회
저자명
윤제식(Je Sik Yoon) 김창윤(Chang Yoon Kim)안준호(Joon-Ho Ahn)
간행물 정보
『신경정신의학』제57권 제2호, 145~156쪽, 전체 12쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 정신과학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2018.05.31
4,240

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Under new mental health and welfare law, involuntary admission is allowed only for persons with mental illness based on the narrowed criteria of mental illness when they meet both need for treatment and danger to themselves and others. These stringent danger criteria along with narrowed definition of mental illness may prevent timely intervention for people with acute psychosis. It is claimed that the danger criteria is essential to keep up with international (UN, WHO) principles for legislation of mental health acts and laws of advanced countries. The international principles, however, do not necessarily call for stringent danger criteria for involuntary hospitalization. Danger criteria are not also prerequisites for involuntary hospitalization in many advanced countries. In countries with strict danger criteria, complementary measures seem to be taken for the drawback of danger criteria. As for the involuntary hospitalization by legal guardians, the complicated qualification for legal guardians may hinder prompt admission. The required number of legal guardians also needs to be changed from two to one person. Even in the situation where involuntary hospitalization is deemed urgent, there is no way to transport the patients to the hospital for assessment or temporary admission unless the police judges the patients to be dangerous to themselves or others. Outpatient treatment order can be an alternative to involuntary admission. However, it is rarely used since the order cannot be applied to those who do not have history of admission due to danger. For voluntary admission, status conversion to involuntary admission needs to be allowed in case of aggravation of symptoms to meet involuntary admission criteria. In addition, informal admission needs to be introduced to avoid unnecessary formal procedures for patients admitting voluntarily to open ward. In view of all these issues with new mental health and welfare law, entire revision of new mental health law is urgent to balance the rights to proper treatments and protection of human rights of persons with mental disorder.

목차

서론
본론
결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

윤제식(Je Sik Yoon),김창윤(Chang Yoon Kim)안준호(Joon-Ho Ahn). (2018).정신건강복지법 비판. 신경정신의학, 57 (2), 145-156

MLA

윤제식(Je Sik Yoon),김창윤(Chang Yoon Kim)안준호(Joon-Ho Ahn). "정신건강복지법 비판." 신경정신의학, 57.2(2018): 145-156

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제