본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

정신보건법의 주요 쟁점 조항에 대한 선진국과의 사례 비교

이용수 36

영문명
Comparison of Major Procedures of Korean Mental Health Law with Other Developed Countries
발행기관
대한신경정신의학회
저자명
홍진표 황순찬 박수빈 서동우 정은기 김진학 박종익 안주연 김수정 장홍석
간행물 정보
『신경정신의학』제48권 제2호, 92~101쪽, 전체 10쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 정신과학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2009.03.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Objectives The Mental Health Act is an initiative aimed at changing and shaping mental health services and protecting human rights of persons with mental disorders. Since the Mental Health Act was legislated in 1995, four amendments have been made according to the issues that arose from public concerns. However, there are still many debates about the human rights protection of the mentally ill. This study aimed to provide information regarding major aspects of the Mental Health Act by comparing them among several developed countries. Methods Current Mental Health Acts of the state of Michigan in the United States, Scotland in England, the state of Victoria in Australia, and Japan were reviewed. Issues regarding the Korean Mental Health Act were collected from seminar materials, news media contents, and mental health professionals. Results The definition of subjects in Korean Mental Health Act was more inclusive than other countries and was derived from a medical classification of mental illness. Family members or guardians were granted important responsibilities for deciding the involuntary admission of mentally ill patients in Korea and Japan. In Western countries, Mental Health Review Tribunals or courts have the primary responsibility for important decisions about mentally ill patients. The regulation of immediate discharge after request by voluntarily admitted patients was not enacted in all countries except Korea. The mandatory procedure for involuntary admission in Western countries includes an individual case review with personal interview by a Mental Health Review Tribunal or court. Conclusion The Korean Mental Health Act appears to meet the basic standards of Guidelines from international organizations. Our traditional culture and inherent health systems seem to influence the legal regulation of mental health service and might be related to the problems of human rights protection of mentally ill patients in Korea

목차

서 론
방 법
결 과
고 찰
결 론
REFERENCES

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

홍진표,황순찬,박수빈,서동우,정은기,김진학,박종익,안주연,김수정,장홍석. (2009).정신보건법의 주요 쟁점 조항에 대한 선진국과의 사례 비교. 신경정신의학, 48 (2), 92-101

MLA

홍진표,황순찬,박수빈,서동우,정은기,김진학,박종익,안주연,김수정,장홍석. "정신보건법의 주요 쟁점 조항에 대한 선진국과의 사례 비교." 신경정신의학, 48.2(2009): 92-101

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제