학술논문
고급 한국어 학습자의 질문 전략을 통한 공손성 실현 양상 분석
이용수 10
- 영문명
- A Study on Politeness by Using a Question Strategy of Learners of Korean
- 발행기관
- 이중언어학회
- 저자명
- 엄진숙
- 간행물 정보
- 『이중언어학』제59호, 111~139쪽, 전체 29쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 언어학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2015.06.30
6,280원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate how to substantialize politeness through question strategy to redress FTAs(Face Threatening Acts) of a negative face. Learners of Korean as L2(Second Language) speakers in Korea acquire knowledge about interrelation between a linguistic form and a pragmatic function; that is to say they use interrogative sentences for various pragmatic purposes that depart from original function: information request. Because speakers desire to communicate successfully by realizing politeness and redressing possibility of FTAs. This paper shows three conclusions by analysing the learner’s languages of conversations, text messages, texts of internet bulletin board and logical rhetorical writings, etc. First, KSL(Korean as a Second Language) learners use interrogative sentences strategically for a communicative intention. They are divided into conventionalized expressions like greeting words and not-conventionalized questions including indirect speech acts. KSL learners produce not-conventionalized questions(67%) more than conventionalized expressions(33%) of all. Second, KSL learners use interrogative sentences the most for expressing opinion(32%) and requesting(27%). This is explained in terms of reaching a systemical variation stage of interlanguage of KSL learners. Third, KSL learners use judgement questions the most and they tend to connect a specific question type with a specific pragmatic function. Judgement questions were used the most in request and confirmation, negative questions were used the most in expressing opinion, wh-questions were used in various functions like ordering(suggestion) and changing a topic, etc. Especially rhetorical questions were connected with expressing opinion.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 연구 배경 및 연구 문제
3. 자료 수집 및 분석 방법
4. 분석 결과 및 논의
5. 맺음말
참고 문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
인문학 > 언어학분야 BEST
더보기인문학 > 언어학분야 NEW
- 예이츠와 여성: 남성적 나르시시즘의 모순
- Learning the Ideal Strategy of Unification from Two Irish Poets, W.B. Yeats & Seamus Heaney
- [Book Review] Deirdre Toomey, Yeats and Women
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
