본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

조약 간 충돌의 해소 원리에 관한 일고

이용수 94

영문명
Settlement of Conflicts of Successive Treaties: Problems in the Interpretation and Application of Article 30 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
발행기관
국제법평론회
저자명
박배근
간행물 정보
『국제법평론』제64호, 1~24쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2023.02.28
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Article 30 of the 1969 VCLT, the most important article in settling conflicts of successive treaties, contains many obscure aspects and problems related to the application. The word ‘successive’ translated into Korean is apt to cause misunderstanding. When we read the Korean text of the article, it should be kept in mind that the word ‘successive’ only means the earlier and later relation in time between different treaties. In Art. 30 of the VCLT, conflict of treaties is expressed as ‘incompatibility’ between an earlier treaty and a later treaty. In this paper, it is suggested that ‘conflict’ includes not only that among prescriptive norms but also that between prescriptive norms and permissive norms. Art. 30 of the 1969 VCLT only applies to the conflicting successive treaties relating to the ‘same subject-matter’. It is a difficult theoretical problem how we can determine the sameness of the subject-matter of two treaties. It may be said that conflict of treaties occurs only when those treaties deal with the same subject-matter. Therefore, this theoretically difficult problem will not cause practical difficulty in the application of the Article. When two successive separate treaties conflict with each other, Art. 30 will be applied. However, when the original treaty and amended treaty conflict with each other, Art. 40 will regulate the problem. Therefore, it is important to discern whether the two conflicting treaties are the original treaty and the amended treaty or not. If a later treaty is agreed upon through amendment procedures, that will be a strong implication that it is an amended treaty rather than a separate new treaty. The last problem concerns the criterion to be used to determine which treaty is earlier or later between two conflicting treaties. As the adoption of the treaty represents the new legislative intention of the parties, the date of adoption will be the most reasonable criterion.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 제30조 개관
Ⅲ. 제30조 적용에 관한 몇 가지 문제
Ⅳ. 맺는말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박배근. (2023).조약 간 충돌의 해소 원리에 관한 일고. 국제법평론, (), 1-24

MLA

박배근. "조약 간 충돌의 해소 원리에 관한 일고." 국제법평론, (2023): 1-24

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제