학술논문
Ways of Telicization in Chinese Resultative Compounds
이용수 3
- 영문명
- Ways of Telicization in Chinese Resultative Compounds
- 발행기관
- 한국생성문법학회
- 저자명
- Chenchen Song Ke Wu
- 간행물 정보
- 『생성문법연구』제32권 제3호, 425~459쪽, 전체 35쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 언어학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2022.08.31
7,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In this paper, we build on Song (2018) and undertake a comparative study of the syntactic behavior of verb-resultative (V-R) compounds in three Chinese varieties: Standard Mandarin, Dongying Mandarin, and Wenzhou Wu. They systematically differ from each other in whether they require an obligatory post-V-R morpheme and, if they do, whether the choice of that morpheme is a purely grammatical issue. We find that while both Dongying Mandarin and Wenzhou Wu require a post-V-R morpheme (whereas Standard Mandarin does not), they sharply differ in the choice of said morpheme. We attribute this cross-dialectal variation to the way Chinese varieties telicize their resultative compounds and propose an analysis based on root syntax. After laying out our analysis, which is an extension of the analysis in Song (2018), we further discuss the parameterization of the three-way variation, arguing for a parameter hierarchy-based model over a flat model.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Data
3. Analysis
4. Parameterization
5. Conclusion
References
해당간행물 수록 논문
- The Syntax and Prosody of DOM and PNI in Mongolian
- Ways of Telicization in Chinese Resultative Compounds
- Raising to Subject in Korean - Optionality, Locality and Restrictions
- On Why-like How-questions in Korean
- 영논항의 비엄밀해석
- A Note on IHRCs: Restrictives vs. Non-Restrictives
- The In-situ Analysis of Why-stripping
- On V-stranding Negative Replies with an Implicit Conjunction in English
- Answering and Reacting with Yes and No to Complex Questions
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!