학술논문
영업비밀 침해금지기간 및 경업금지기간의 기산점 및 종점에 관한 연구
이용수 165
- 영문명
- A Study on Starting Point & Ending Point of Trade Secret Infringement Injunction Period and Non-competition Injunction Period
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 장광홍(Guanghong ZHANG) 정차호(Chaho JUNG)
- 간행물 정보
- 『과학기술과 법』제12권 제1호, 245~297쪽, 전체 53쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2021.06.30
9,160원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper discusses starting point and ending point of each injunction period of three different situations, where trade secret injunction is requested, non-competition injunction is requested and both of them are requested. This paper specifies problems in many holdings of Korean courts as the followings: (1) many holdings do not tell the difference between a preventive injunction against future acts and a damages remedy on past acts; (2) notwithstanding breach of a non-competition agreement, the court does not issue an injunction order under the reason that non-competition period has already expired; (3) even though certain information maintains trade secret status, many trade secret injunction orders have an ending point; (4) many holdings do not tell the difference between a non-competition case and a trade secret case. This paper proposes problem-solving jurisprudence as the followings. Firstly, starting point of injunction period shall be the holding day and any day before the holding day cannot be such a starting point. Injunction is remedy against future act after the holding day. On a past act, only damages remedy is available. Secondly, even though non-competition agreement period has expired during court proceeding, the court should, in an appropriate circumstance, issue a non-competition injunction order which starts from the holding day and remains for some period. Such jurisprudence which does not do so may make a non-competition agreement meaningless. Thirdly, in a trade secret infringement injunction order, a perpetual period without an ending point shall be the principle. Only if the defendant clearly proves that the information at issue shall lose its trade secret status in the not-so-distant future, the court may exceptionally set an ending point of the injunction period. Fourthly, the court shall differentiate among a trade secret injunction case, a non-competition injunction case and a case where two injunctions were requested together and shall hold in accordance with character of the request.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 경업금지기간 및 영업비밀 침해금지기 간의 기산점에 대한 우리 법리의 현황과 문제점
Ⅲ. 기산점의 개념에 대한 연구
Ⅳ. 영업비밀 침해금지기간 및 경업금지기 간의 기산점에 대한 미국의 법리
Ⅴ. 금지기간 기산점 및 종점에 대한 유형별 분류
Ⅵ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!