본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

재판 외의 분쟁해결제도에 대한 반추

이용수 24

영문명
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
강수미
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제10권 제1호, 205~239쪽, 전체 35쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2006.05.30
7,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Increasing complexity and diversity of the current society has resulted in the diverse and various types of disputes, and, therefore not all disputes can be set-tled efficiently by means of court adjudication which applies a law strictly. To overcome such problems, we need to make use of ADR implying all methods for resolving dispute without resorting to litigation. There are various types of ADR. The basic forms of ADR can be classified as negotiation, mediation and arbitration. Hybrid forms may also derive from basic forms. In Korea, currently negotiation, mediation, inter-mediation, settlement, ar-bitration and so on are used in ADR fields. The best way to apply ADR, however, should be dealt with much caution and careful consideration since the matter cannot be discussed uniformly. Most importantly, judges and lawyers should come to appreciate ADR when applying it to an individual case properly. It is advised that they are well equip-ped with the full knowledge on the subject in order to play such a vital role in the court. In a situation where a judge interprets that the application of law is not suited for the solution of a dispute, he or she has to take a role of not an umpire but an adviser for the dispute. Also, a lawyer must inform the avail-ability of ADR as means of settling dispute to a client and persuade the client to take advantage of ADR when necessary. It is recommended that the college of law offers ADR course to its students, and operates a ADR training program for judges and lawyers. ADR is institutionalized in a systematic manner and based on public sentiment. Moreover, a group of experts on diverse sections of the society has to participate in ADR. Because general public is a stranger to ADR, a public rela-tions campaign is to be widened.

목차

Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 기본적인 裁判 外의 紛爭解決方法
Ⅲ. 裁判 外의 紛爭解決方法의 類型
Ⅳ. 우리나라에서의 裁判 外의 紛爭解決制度 運用實態
Ⅴ. 結論
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

강수미. (2006).재판 외의 분쟁해결제도에 대한 반추. 민사소송, 10 (1), 205-239

MLA

강수미. "재판 외의 분쟁해결제도에 대한 반추." 민사소송, 10.1(2006): 205-239

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제