학술논문
국내토지관할 규정의 국제적 정합성
이용수 15
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 한충수
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제13권 제2호, 125~148쪽, 전체 24쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.11.30
5,680원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In 2001 Korean Private International Law(KPIL) was totally revised to change it’s role in legal field. In the past KIPL has handled just applicable law but revised law handles also international jurisdiction. Especially, art. 2 provides principle of international jurisdiction although it is very abstract and codifies mainly stance of the past judicial precedents of the Korean Supreme Court(KSC). However, the KSC has had similar opinion even after the revise of KPIL and sometimes did not obey intent of art. 2. In the event, we could not achieve our goal with KIPL art. 2 because it contains very abstract principle of international jurisdiction and the potential parties could not precisely prognose Korean court’s decision about international jurisdiction. Then we need to make specific jurisdiction clauses of international jurisdiction such as domestic jurisdiction clauses in Korean Civil Procedural Law(KCPL). In this article the author wrote about general jurisdiction of judicial person and special jurisdiction of establishment and the site of assets because these clauses have been frequently used for international jurisdiction of foreign corporations. However, these clauses are not suitable for international jurisdiction because these are very discriminative against foreigners and normally use of these clauses has been forbidden in the international agreements and conventions such as Brussels I. In this year Japanese government published a tentative plan for regulation of specific international jurisdiction clauses. Japanese efforts for making specific international jurisdiction clauses are very impressive even if some clauses are very far from international standard, especially they want to maintain special circumstances theory. Korean legal society also has to make a great effort to make specific international jurisdiction clauses and the author wants this article to be used for making it sooner or later.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 普通裁判籍과 事務所(營業所) 所在地 特別裁判籍
Ⅲ. 財産所在地 特別裁判籍
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!