학술논문
가사조정제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 연구
이용수 22
- 영문명
- A Study on the Improvement Plan for Family Mediation System
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 김성태(Kim, Sung-Tae)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제19권 제1호, 433~473쪽, 전체 41쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2015.05.30
7,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
As family members are diversified, many disputes arise, and in addition, resolutions appropriate to these are, however, demanded but resolutions to quantitative and qualitative increase of domestic cases confront lots of difficulties. Among proper dispute resolutions to domestic cases, even though the family dispute mediation system, stipulated in Family Litigation Act can be ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution), the family mediation system is regarded as still having problems due to below parts. First, because the arbitrary disposition of the person concerned is not recognized in the classification of family cases that is an object of the family mediation system, a case that can not be practically mediated is regulated as a family mediation case. Second, compared to the necessity of the family court probation officer system that is prepared under the guardianship of the court in order to understand the actual conditions of family disputes, unreasonable numbers of manpower are taking care of parts of unfair family mediation affairs which becomes an obstacle to activate the family mediation system. Third, the decision system that substitutes mediation is abused. Fourth, the statements of mediation procedures are quoted in litigation procedures. The family mediation system based on the principle that the independent resolution of the parties concerned should be above any others, must newly reclassify the classification system of Article of Family Litigation Act as the cases that become the objects of family mediation from only the family cases that can be mediated arbitrarily in order to recognize the scope of family cases corresponding to family mediation cases as the scope of family mediation that is actually mediated arbitrarily by the parties concerned. Furthermore, the roles and rights of family court probation officers required to confirm a substantial truth are well prepared in our family litigation act, but manpower of family court probation officers should be expanded to make physical and personal fundamental preparation in compliance with the systematic purport of the family litigation act. In addition, in case that family mediation procedures are undertaken to prevent the decision system substituting mediation for swift dispute resolution of the court in the family mediation procedures from being abused, in particular, mediation procedures for contriving to have true dispute resolutions by respecting and listening to the opinions of the parties concerned should be made. Moreover, as for quoting the mediation records of the mediation procedures in the judicial process, systematic safety devices should be prepared for the parties concerned not to be afraid of the quotation of the mediation records in the judicial process but to actively participate in mediation, and from this basis, the family mediation system must be activated. At present, because family disputes stem from human and multilateral conflicts within families and many subjective reasons occur complicatedly, dispute resolutions should be judged not only with rationality but also the family mediation system should play its role in order to help the parties concerned solve their disputes independently from considering various factors, and the cases that family disputes are resolved through the family mediation system will increase. Even in the future, like the case of the Whole Amendment of Family Litigation Act decided by the Supreme Court on Feb. 6, 2015, systematic devices should be continuously inspected through consistent interest in and revision on Family Litigation Act so that the parties concerned independently resolve family disputes and the Family Court can play its sufficient guardianship in a wider meaning.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 가사조정제도 개관
Ⅲ. 가사조정제도의 문제점과 개선방안
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 항소심 심리 개선의 방향
- 가사조정제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 연구
- 한국에서의 ADR의 경험과 진전
- 민사조정법에 의한 조정절차의 공정성과 당사자의 절차적 지위의 보장
- 刊行辭
- 전자화문서와 원본제출주의
- 외국판결의 승인·집행에 관한 2014년 개정 민사소송법·민사집행법의 의의 및 향후 전망
- 배당요구종기의 법적 성질에 대한 연구
- 효율적인 집행과 국가책임
- 제6회 한중 민사소송법 국제학술대회 참석 후기
- 중재법 개정 법률안의 주요내용
- 가사소송에서의 미성년 자녀의 절차적 지위
- 독일민사소송법에서의 증거평가와 증명도
- 판결의 하자(瑕疵)의 소송상 취급
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!