을사조약 반대상소와 5대신의 반박상소에 나타난 을사조약의 문제점

• 영문명: The Problems of the Treaty of 1905 from the Appeals against the Treaty and the Refutation Appeal of Five-Ministers
• 발행기관: 한국근현대사학회
• 저자명: 李相燦(Lee, Sang-chan)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국근현대사연구』제64집, 7~37쪽, 전체 31쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.03.30

영문 초록

It is important whether Emperor Gojong approved the signing of the Treaty of 1905(乙巳條約), but not that complicated to confirm a fact. Four documents are required for emperor’s approval. These are the proposal with the emperor’s signature(御押) and seal(御璽), the power of attorney for treaty conclusion, instruments of ratification, and the proposal of publication in the official gazette. However, there is none of 4 documents for the Treaty of 1905. Because it directly came up to the signing step without domestic law procedure. According to legislation of Daehan Empire(“Euijeongbu Bureaucracy”(議政府官制) and “Euijeongbu Conference Regulation”(議政府會議規程)), the proposal for treaty should go through seven stages, ①receiving at the Foreign Ministry ② Foreign Ministry’s discussion request to Euijeongbu ③ passing at the Euijeongbu conference ④ consultation of Joongchoowon(中樞院) ⑤ writing of the adress to the throne ⑥ emperor’s approval ⑦ delegation, signing, ratification. The treaty proposal was received at the Foreign Ministry, but it jumped over the following procedure. Right after the treaty was concluded, on the 19th November, elder statesmen and government officials continued to devote appeals which claim the invalidity of the treaty and their resignation, also they directly tell the emperor their opinions staying at the palace day and night. Even foreign press reported the defect of the treaty. Some killed themselves in despair over their country’s ruination. Japan oppressed people who are appealing against the treaty calling the army, but it could not make the movement stop. Therefore, Japan had to come up with the remedy for the situation. Ito Hirobumi arranged the whole procedure of the treaty(伊藤特派大使復命書). Furthermore, Japan made “five-ministers (5-thieves) of Daehan Empire” write a refutation appeal about the full account of the treaty conclusion to the emperor for it’s own sake. However, the refutation appeal from five-ministers of Daehan Empire actually gave unfavorable evidence toward Japan as a result. The evidence are as follows. Japan neglected the Daehan Empire’s regulation for the treaty conclusion. Emperor Gojong didn’t command the approval of the treaty but the amendment. Emperor ordered in secret for opposition to the treaty. Ito threatened emperor Gojong not to decline to approve the treaty.

목차

1. 머리말

2. 관료 유생층의 을사조약 반대상소가 제기한 문제점

3. 5대신의 반박상소에 나타난 체결과정의 문제점

4. 맺음말

참고문헌

키워드

을사조약 을사조약 반대(상소 사직 자결) 5대신(을사오적 5대신 반박상소 의정부 관제 의정부회의규정 조약의 처리 절차(청의 의정부 회의 중추원 자문 상주 황제의 재가) 조약의 파기 The Treaty of 1905(乙巳條約) Opposing to the Treaty of 1905 five-ministers(five-thieves 乙巳五賊) the refutation of five-ministers Euijeongbu Bureaucracy Euijeongbu Conference Regulation the treaty conclusion procedure(discussion request Euijeongbu conference consultation of Joongchoowon the proposal from Euijeongbu to the throne emperor’s approval)