학술논문
과실책임과 손해전보의 원리
이용수 180
- 영문명
- Principle of liability with fault and compensation for damage
- 발행기관
- 전남대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김동호(Kim, Dong-Ho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논총』제27권 제2호, 1~34쪽, 전체 34쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
6,880원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
From the time when The Civil Code in France was made at the beginning of the 19th century and when the modern legal science of civil law began to form, we have conclusively thought that tort-liability is identical with liability with fault.
The fundamental idea behind the thought was that intent or negligence is inevitably required to establish liability. But the circumstances of present days have made us recognize liability without fault or responsibility of risk. The only problem lies not in whether we should recognize liability without fault or responsibility of risk but in how we understand the nature of those liabilities in that context of traditional fault.
On reflecting the history of tort, we can see that its nature has changed and advanced from retribution to liability with fault, from liability with fault to social liability, and that its function from punishment, chastisement and suppression to compensation and loss-elocation. At last New Zealand made regulations that society and nation should be responsible for the damages to its’ members, made a system joining liability with insurance, and took the victims’ smooth return to the society as its goal. In spite of the hot disputes in the legislation process, such a revolutionary system is deemed positive as a whole, and in some nations the system becomes the object to study and to be reflected on their systems.
In light of the history and background of the idea on liability with fault, the idea regarded every citizen as a being with reasonable personality and liberal will, as its premise, in the forming and developing stage of earlier liberalism and capitalism. The idea also took it as its premise that liability should be recognized only on the ground of liberal will. As a result of reflection on liberalism and capitalism, in nowadays, the social and communitarian idea about human being, nation and society has been set firmly as a confining principle to liability with fault.
In comparison with various principles of liability in the field of private laws, we can hardly assert that even liability for failure of obligation is subject to the principle of liability with fault, and the obligation of restitution is very much similar to liability without fault, in reality and in the contents.
In conclusion, it is correct to say that liability of tort means only ‘objectively illegal act’. If responsibility of risk exists within the category of liability of tort, there can be no problem. It is also correct to understand that liability with fault and liability without fault or responsibility of risk exist all within the field of liability of tort. If liability of tort is confined within the boundary of liability with fault, responsibility of risk shall be excepted from liability of tort and shall remain as a seperate liability. Then the system with this legal principle is not solid.
Because liability without fault or responsibility of risk is very similar to the case of liability of tort, except for the absence of negligence.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 몇 가지 기초개념
Ⅲ. 과실책임주의
Ⅳ. 무과실책임
Ⅴ. 과실책임과 무과실책임의 통합론의 배경
Ⅵ. 과실책임과 무과실책임의 통합론의 내용
Ⅶ. 맺음말
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- ICJ의 선택선언에 대한 유보의 유형 분석
- 암성 통증관리와 관련한 마약사고와 법적 책임
- 중국 상장회사 사외이사제도에 관한 연구
- 일본에서의 지방세조례주의론
- 日本における法科大学院教育の現状
- 債務不履行을 이유로 하는 損害賠償과 債務者의 帰責事由
- 장애 여성의 재생산권에 대한 고찰
- 와세다대학 법과대학원에서의 「이론과 실무의 가교」
- 시민사회단체의 현황과 제도적 개선방향
- 발간사
- 등기관의 주의의무
- 債務不履行과 背任罪(再論)
- 中國 傳統社會의 家父長權
- 과실책임과 손해전보의 원리
- 개정 해상법의 주요 쟁점에 관한 고찰
- 특허보호가 경제 성장에 미치는 영향
- 早稲田大学法科大学院における 「理論と実務の架橋」
- 일본 법과대학원 교육의 현재 상황
- 債務不履行を理由とする損害賠償と債務者の帰責事由
- 유비쿼터스 시대를 위한 의료법의 개선방안
- 중국 물권법상 토지소유권에 대한 고찰
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!