주요 중재 규칙에서 병합조항의 비교 분석

• 영문명: Comparative Analysis of Consolidation Clauses in the Leading Arbitration Rules
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 이춘원(Lee, Choonwon)
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제30권 제1호, 67~86쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2020.02.29

영문 초록

In the case of multiple commerce contracts in commerce, as well as multiple contracts related to it, a solution for the merging of arbitration proceedings is necessary in order to ensure uniformity of dispute resolution. Since the arbitration proceedings are based on the parties agreement, no merging of two or more arbitration proceedings may transpire unless all parties agree. Claims of merging in arbitration proceedings lead to problems such as lack of party autonomy, resulting from lack of consent of the parties to merging, and how to appoint an arbitrator in a multilateral arbitration proceeding. Many of the major arbitration bodies have recognized the significant benefits of the terms of consolidation, and have recently revised the Arbitration Rules to include or extend existing clauses to reflect the needs of the parties. This study introduces the merging provisions of several selected major arbitration rules, such as the ICC, Switzerland, SCC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, ACICA, and UNCITRAL rules, and looks at the main similarities and differences among the rules.

목차

Ⅰ. 서

Ⅱ. 중재의 병합에 관한 주요 중재기관의 규정

Ⅲ. 병합 조항의 비교 분석

Ⅳ. 결 론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

중재의 병합 국제상거래법위원회 런던 국제 중재 법원 싱가포르 국제 중재센터 스톡홀름 상공 회의소 홍콩 국제중재센터 consolidation of arbitration The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law The London Court of International Arbitration Singapore International Arbitration Center Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre