论丁愚潭对李栗谷的批判 -以人心道心相为始终说为中心-

• 영문명: On Woodam’s Criticism for Yulgok: Centering on the Theory of Mutual Beginning-End between Human Mind and Moral Mind
• 발행기관: 한림대학교 태동고전연구소
• 저자명: 谢 晓 东 (Xiaodong Xie)
• 간행물 정보: 『태동고전연구』제42집, 121~158쪽, 전체 38쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 기타인문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.06.30

국문 초록

从李退溪的基本立场出发, 丁愚潭批评了李栗谷的人心道心相为始终说｡ 他认为该 说对人心, 道心的概念规定上存在三个致命错误：第一, 通过气之掩与不掩来规定人 心道心的做法；第二, 人心人欲说；第三, 道心是本然之气说｡ 以此为基础, 作为人心 道心思想关系的一种处理模式的相为始终说就存在难以克服的困境, 因而是不合朱子 立言之本义｡ 应该说, 愚潭的这些批评是非常有力的｡ 愚潭在反驳栗谷的同时, 还维护 了退溪的基本观点, 即理发气发的二重区分｡ 退溪和栗谷人心道心说的基本差异的根 源在于对理气强弱之看法不同, 而这又建立在理是否具有活动性和心是合理气的还是 心是气等更为根本的预设之上｡ 从外在表现来看, 双方对罗整庵的态度则是检测仪, 可以凸显出对立学派的差异｡ 相对于葛庵对栗谷的抨击, 愚潭的批判则更具学理性｡

영문 초록

From Toegye’s basic standpoint, Woodam criticized Yulgok’s view that theory of mutual beginning-end between Human Mind and Moral Mind (ren-xin-dao-xin-xiang-wei-shi-zhong-shuo). He believes that there are three fatal errors in the definitions of human mind and moral mind: firstly, to stipulating human mind and moral mind through the concealment and concealment of Qi(气); secondly, the theory of human mind is selfish desire; and thirdly, the idea of moral mind is original Qi. On this basis, as a mode of dealing with the relationship between human mind and moral mind, there will always be an insurmountable dilemma, which is not in line with the original meaning of Master Zhu’s statement. It should be said that these criticisms of Woodam are very powerful. While refuting Yulgok, Woodam maintains the basic view of Toegye, that is, the double distinction between principal presents and qi presents. The basic difference between Toegye and Yulgok’s theories of human mind and moral mind lies in their different views on the strength and weakness between principle(理) and qi, which is based on the more fundamental presuppositions of whether principle has activity and whether heart-mind is the unity of principle and qi. From the external performance, the attitudes of the two sides towards Luo Zhengan are detectors, which can highlight the differences between the opposing schools. Compared with Galam’s attack of Yulgok, Woodam’s criticism is more rational.

목차

一、 李栗谷人心道心相为始终说的基本内容

二、 丁愚潭对栗谷人心、道心概念的三项批评

三、 愚潭对人心道心相为始终说的批评

四、 理气强弱：道心人心思想分歧之根源

五、 愚潭的反击：理并不弱

六、 愚潭反击的几个基本预设

七、 愚潭对栗谷人心道心说中罗整庵因素的批评

八、 和李葛庵相比愚潭对栗谷人心道心说之批评 的推进处

九、 结语

키워드

丁愚潭李栗谷 人心道心相为 始终 说 朱子 罗 整庵 Woodam Yulgok Lee Theory of Mutual Beginning-Ending between Human Mind and Moral Mind(ren-xin-dao-xin-xiang-wei-shi-zhong-shuo) Master Zhu Luo Zhengan