2016년 중재법상의 중재판정의 효력에 대한 몇 가지 의문과 별소의 심급 제한

• 영문명: Some Questions on the Effect of an Arbitral Award and Restriction of Trial Level in Other Separate Actions Under the 2016 Korean Arbitration Act
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 윤진기(Jin-Ki Yoon)
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제27권 제4호, 3~33쪽, 전체 31쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2017.12.30

영문 초록

This paper examines some questions and issues of the effect of an arbitral award, and discusses about the restriction of the trial level in other separate actions permitted under the existence of grounds of setting aside arbitral award after the amendment of the Arbitration Act in 2016. Because there are no interests of litigation in the action for setting aside arbitral award due to the exclusion of res judicata by provisory clause of Article 35, filing an action for setting aside is not allowed even when the grounds of setting aside exist. If we examine the precedent on possibility of retrial for excluding the outward form of invalid judgement, we can find that the court did not approve the retrial. Therefore, the action for setting aside that which is for excluding the outward form of an arbitral award will not be allowed for filing. On the issue of whether an arbitral award having a ground for setting aside can be an object of the action for setting aside for excluding its outward form or not, the views of scholars are divided. In the case of an arbitral award that has grounds for setting aside, it could be interpreted that the arbitral award would not have a formale Rechtskraft or effect of sentence (bindende Kraft). Even if there is formale Rechtskraft or effect of sentence (bindende Kraft), the significance of existence of action for setting aside arbitral award under paragraph 1 of Article 36 is reduced because other actions separate from arbitration is permitted under the 2016 Act. The amendment of the Arbitration Act in 2016 provides an opportunity to review the position and the role of action for setting aside the arbitral award. It also requires further studies on efficiently treating other actions separate from arbitration. Because the restriction of the trial level of other separate actions can make arbitration active by making arbitration procedures become 3 trial levels from 4 trial levels, it needs to be solved with legislative action. Specifically, if the trial starts at the stage of trial on appeal, it can utilize the strength of both the arbitration and the litigation, playing a chief role in boosting arbitration by removing the problems of action for setting aside and enabling arbitration institutes and the person interested to promote the activation of arbitration.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 중재판정의 효력에 관한 몇 가지 의문과 검토

Ⅲ. 별소 심급 제한의 필요성과 그 구체적 방안

Ⅳ. 결 론

키워드

중재법 중재판정 중재판정 효력 기판력 형식적 확정력 중재판정 취소 중재 arbitration act arbitral award effect of arbitral award res judicata effect of sentence bindende Kraft setting aside arbitral award arbitration