학술논문
The Procedural Benefits of Arbitrating Patent Disputes
이용수 2
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국중재학회
- 저자명
- Kap‐ You (Kevin) Kim Umaer Khalil
- 간행물 정보
- 『중재연구』 제26권 제3호, 51~66쪽, 전체 16쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 무역학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2016.09.30
4,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper considers how various types of patent disputes can be more efficiently resolved through arbitration, rather than litigation. For this analysis, it takes three types of patent disputes as a control sample – contractual disputes, infringement disputes and FRAND disputes – and assess how these disputes can be better resolved through arbitration in terms of several criteria, namely, the suitability of the decision‐makers, the number of forums in which disputes have to separately decided and enforced, procedural flexibility and confidentiality. The paper takes into consideration that certain types of patent disputes, such as infringement disputes and FRAND disputes are unlikely to be subject to pre‐existing arbitration agreements. In these types of disputes, parties may make the decision between arbitration and litigation based on strategic and tactical concerns, rather than legal ones. The paper concludes that, given this limitation, it is not possible to categorically state whether arbitration is more suitable than litigation for resolving patent disputes. The most sensible course to follow in adopting arbitration for patent disputes is for legal advisors to be familiar with the intricate benefits and pitfalls of arbitration in patent disputes, and to actively consider referring a dispute to arbitration over litigation after a dispute has arisen.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Types of IP Disputes
Ⅲ. Advantages of Arbitration
Ⅳ. Discussion and Conclusion
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- Park Tae-hwan v. The Korean Olympic Committee: The Breakdown of Sports Jurisprudence in Korea
- Combining Arbitration with Mediation: Two Cultures of China and Malaysia
- The Procedural Benefits of Arbitrating Patent Disputes
- A Study on the Dispute Settlement Procedure for the Preferential Rules of Origin
- Recent Developments in the EU Investment Policy : Towards an Investment World Court?
- Interim Measures in Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Korea and China
- Recent changes to the Korean Arbitration Act and its Comparison with Singapore: Korea’s Potential to Become an Arbitration Hub
- Unresolved Issues in Patent Dispute Evidence in Australia: Considering Arbitration as an Alternative to Litigation
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!