Interim Measures in Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Korea and China

• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: Woo-Jung Jon
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제26권 제3호, 67~91쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2016.09.30

영문 초록

In an era where the international investment and trade between Korea and China grow daily, the importance of international arbitration cannot be overstated. The Korean Arbitration Law was enacted with reference to the UNCITRAL Model Law. When the Chinese Arbitration Law was being enacted, the UNCITRAL Model Law was also referred to, but there are some discrepancies between the two. This article conducts comparative analysis based on the Korean and the Chinese Arbitration Laws, the Chinese Civil Procedure Law and the KCAB and the CIETAC arbitration rules. In order to adopt the UNCITRAL Model Law amended in 2006, Korea revised its Arbitration Law in 2016. The revised Law includes a more comprehensive legal regime regarding interim measures, emergency arbitrator, etc. In China, the enforcement of foreign-related arbitral awards and foreign arbitral awards is carried out mainly by intermediate people’s courts. In China, the report system to the higher people’s court for refusing the enforcement of foreign-related arbitral awards and for refusing the recognition or enforcement of foreign arbitral awards has the effect of safeguarding foreign-related arbitral awards and foreign arbitral awards in China. Both Korea and China joined the New York Convention, and domestic courts may refuse the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards according to the New York Convention.

키워드

Interim Measures Emergency Arbitrator Set Aside of Arbitral Awards Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards New York Convention