본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

스포츠중재의 필요성과 중재합의에 관한 고찰

이용수 25

영문명
A Study on the Need for Arbitration and Agreement in Sports Disputes
발행기관
한국중재학회
저자명
전홍구(Hong-Gu Jeon)
간행물 정보
『중재연구』 제26권 제1호, 3~27쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 무역학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.03.30
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

There is a need for disputes in sports to be settled by arbitration rather than a court ruling, taking the unique characteristics of sports into consideration. Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). A dispute resolution system is regarded as: an arbitrator is selected by the agreement between the parties, and a binding decision is made, which the parties obey, consequently resulting in a final resolution. To resolve a dispute upon arbitration, there must be an arbitration agreement upon the free will of the parties. In relation to the arbitration agreement, however, there are some cases in which sports organizations have an arbitration clause in the articles of association, regulations or player registration application that call for settling disputes by arbitration. In such cases, the validity of the arbitration agreement may create doubt whether or not this sort of arbitration has been made by mutual agreement. Consequently this is required to be legally examined. The activities of a sports organization are recognized as part of private autonomy, and they include even the rights that establish regulations or rules. Nonetheless, the powers that such sport organizations are able to establish are not allowed without limit. However, sports activities and autonomy shall be protected as themselves. Therefore, if we give priority to arbitration upon the independent arbitrator and fair process by establishing an independent arbitral organization in charge of sports disputes to handle the effective resolution of disputes and protect sports autonomy and ask for a court decision if one party disobeys the arbitration, or the sports arbitration prepositive principle, it seems helpful to resolve the unfairness of compulsory jurisdiction and the clause for sports arbitration and protect the player’s right of choice and of claims for trial.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 스포츠분쟁 해결제도 일반론
Ⅲ. 스포츠중재의 필요성과 중재기구
Ⅳ. 스포츠 중재합의의 법률적 효력
Ⅴ. 결 론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

전홍구(Hong-Gu Jeon). (2016).스포츠중재의 필요성과 중재합의에 관한 고찰. 중재연구, 26 (1), 3-27

MLA

전홍구(Hong-Gu Jeon). "스포츠중재의 필요성과 중재합의에 관한 고찰." 중재연구, 26.1(2016): 3-27

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제