본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

국경(Grenze)에서 접경(Kontaktzone)으로

이용수 128

영문명
From “Frontier” to “Contact Zones” : Eastern Border Studies in the German Historiography of the Twentieth Century
발행기관
중앙대학교 중앙사학연구소
저자명
차용구(Yong Ku Cha)
간행물 정보
『중앙사론』제47집, 299~335쪽, 전체 37쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2018.06.30
7,240

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In this article, we will look at twentieth century Germany s eastern border studies. According to the traditional border studies of the 19th and early 20th centuries, borders were exclusive lines with the function of protection, disconnection, control, and interdiction. The eastern border of Germany was understood to be the stronghold of a civilized territory where Germanic inheritance and advanced culture had spread since the High Middle Ages. The loss of the border would have been understood as the defeat of civilization by barbarism, and it was a sacred boundary that must be defended. New borderlands research in the 1970s revealed that the notion of the border in the premodern era was not as a definite line. Germania Slavica, the contact zones between medieval Germany and the Slavic culture, was not a fault line but hybrid zones of cultural encounters and inter-ethnic relations. Some Slavs moved into German-speaking areas where they were employed in, and integrated into, German domains: there were significant processes of entanglement and accommodation, and also of powerful contest. In Germania Slavica, there was no ethnic hatred that scholars later imagined, and so the conflicts between medieval German- and Slavonic-speaking people should not be projected as the nationalistimages. Social interactions cut across ethnic lines. Overall, Germania Slavica research emphasizes the harmonious birth of a new hybrid culture, and it can be highlighted that the process of conflict and exclusion is relatively neglected in the field. Moreover, the subject and direction of Germania Slavica research has combined with West Germany’s Neue Ostpolitik of the 1970s. In particular, the research group led by Christian Lüdtke in Leipzig was related to the European integration movements of the late 1990s and the expansion of the European Union in Eastern Europe. These efforts to dismantle the prejudice and politics of nationally-driven historiography also face the dilemma of corresponding to the realpolitik.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 무기가 된 국경연구
Ⅲ. 접경연구
Ⅳ. 새로운 공간담론
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

차용구(Yong Ku Cha). (2018).국경(Grenze)에서 접경(Kontaktzone)으로. 중앙사론, 47 (1), 299-335

MLA

차용구(Yong Ku Cha). "국경(Grenze)에서 접경(Kontaktzone)으로." 중앙사론, 47.1(2018): 299-335

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제