본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

클라우제비츠의 <전쟁론>이 마르크스주의에 미친 영향

이용수 39

영문명
The Influence of Karl von Clausewitz’s On War upon the Marxism
발행기관
한국세계문화사학회
저자명
이주천(Ju-Cheon Lee)
간행물 정보
『세계역사와 문화연구』제29집, 73~96쪽, 전체 24쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2013.12.30
5,680

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This article is intended to search and analyze the influence of Clausewitz’s military thinking and his ideas upon the Marxists during the late 19th century and the early 20th century. For the prominent leadership of the Marxists who had tried to make the revolutionary movements from the bourgeoisie society by the proletariat class, had concerned with a great interest of the war and the military affairs. Especially, they firmly believed and praised the Clausewitz’s maxim, “war is merely the continuation of policy by other mean.” Especially Frederick Engels, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, and Leon Trotsky. etc. Among them, Engels was the first runner of the military thinker who had read Clausewitz’s ‘On War’ and received his military ideas and had a great interest in the military affairs rather than that of Karl Marx, and had experienced himself with some military activities and technology. But although he was involved with some military affairs together with the revolutionary struggle of the labor class in Germany and an ardent believer of the inevitable revolution, he remained as an ‘amateur general’ who believed that it should be necessary to organize and make the labor class armed. His military view could not escape from the German points. On the other hand, Lenin was opposite to the Russian engagement into the World War I, because he believed that the Great War was the greedy struggles among the Western Imperial Powers after seriously considering the revolutionary movement. He urged the international labor class not to enter the battlefields or fighting with each other. But after he realized that he could not control the nationalist movement and jingoism in the each country, Lenin tried to transform the Clausewitz’s maxim, “war is merely the continuation of policy by other mean” into the Russian reality. That mean that Lenin and the Bolsheviks should encourage the international civil war by the militant uprising of the international labor class. Finally, Lenin engineered to succeed the Bolsheviks revolution in November, 1917. He regularly read Clausewitz On War, and cited Clausewitz’s maxim in his notes and speeches and even advised his comrades to read it carefully. The second top leader among the Bolsheviks members, Trotsky also read Clausewitz’s writing and cited them in his speeches and writings. And as the Red Army’s organizer and commander in chief, he further made those which Lenin had transformed Clausewitz’s maxim into the Russian situation neat. But unfortunately for Trotsky, after the failure of struggle for power, Trotsky’s viewpoint, even though those of his were similar with those of Lenin, was excluded as a heresy in the Marxist world.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 엥겔스가 본 전쟁과 평화
Ⅲ. 레닌과 트로츠키의 전쟁론
Ⅳ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이주천(Ju-Cheon Lee). (2013).클라우제비츠의 <전쟁론>이 마르크스주의에 미친 영향. 세계역사와 문화연구, 29 , 73-96

MLA

이주천(Ju-Cheon Lee). "클라우제비츠의 <전쟁론>이 마르크스주의에 미친 영향." 세계역사와 문화연구, 29.(2013): 73-96

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제