활자 인쇄술 개발의 前後史에 대한 再檢討

• 영문명: A Reconsideration of the History of the Typography Development -From superiority of technology to varieties of culture -
• 발행기관: 중앙대학교 중앙사학연구소
• 저자명: 남영(Nam Young)
• 간행물 정보: 『중앙사론』제29집, 1~37쪽, 전체 37쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.06.30

국문 초록

Typography was invented independently in East Asia and Europe. However, the ripple effect was significantly different in East Asia and Europe. There have been various explanations that try to clarify whether the difference was caused by technological or cultural differences. Until now, most of the explanations about Eastern typography have come up with simplified conclusions, refering only to the backwardness of Eastern typography or the conservative character of Eastern society. Previous studies tended to compare East Asia and Europe in the simple time frame, leading the conclusion that the ripple effect was small in Eastern society as their typography was primitive and Eastern culture tended to be conservative. The purpose of this study is to suggest that we can explain why East Asian and European typographies brought out different social effects on each society only when we understand such differences between East Asia and Europe as the tradition of ancient Eastern xylography, distinctive features of ancient Eastern culture, and characteristics of materials for paper and its production procedures. When we carry out comparative study of East Asian and European printing technologies, it is necessary to take comprehensive social and cultural approach not just to superiority or inferiority of printing technology , but also to varieties of printing culture.

목차

머리말

Ⅰ. 조선과 유럽의 활자 인쇄술 발전과정의 기술적차이를 강조하는 논의들에 대한 재검토

Ⅱ. 조선과 유럽의 활자 인쇄술 발전과정의 문화적차이를 강조하는 논의들에 대한 재검토

Ⅲ. 조선의 활자 인쇄기술의 의미에 대한 재인식: 주목받지 못한 구텐베르크 시대 이전의 동아시아 인쇄기술과 문화

맺음말

키워드

인쇄술 인쇄혁명 활판인쇄술 목판인쇄술 금속활자 구텐베르크 인쇄자동화 printing printing revolution Gutenberg typography xylography printing automation