학술논문
독일ㆍ소련의 대(對) 헝가리 전시외교정책
이용수 63
- 영문명
- German and Soviet Foreign Policy toward Hungary - On the Second Vienna Award in 1940. 8. 29 -
- 발행기관
- 한국독일사학회
- 저자명
- 김지영(Jiyoung Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『독일연구』Vol.5, 39~59쪽, 전체 21쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 역사학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2003.06.30
5,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Transylvania has been invested with a mythic significance by the political cultures of Hungary and Rumania. Hungarians have arrived and settle down in this area, which became their homeland.
The problem of Transylvania among Hungary and Rumania is based on the historical facts. Since the Trianon Peace Treaty in 1920, Hungary’s aim of foreign policy was to reannex Transylvania. As a result of political promotion with the Axis powers, Hungary took the chance of reannexation.
On the 29th of June 1940, Rumania, having fulfilled the Soviet claims, surrendered Bessarabia and North-Bukovina, and in the mean time France capitulated. These two events, among other things, brought radical changes both in Hungarian political thinking and in Hungarian political power relations. These measures strengthened the earlier decisions of the government that the Transylvanian revision had to be realized before the end of the war.
Although in this question German support was crucial, the government gathered information about the Soviet. Their viewpoint was negative. Germany, interested in the peaceful continuity of the Rumanian oil-possibility of a postwar revision. They also urged direct Hungarian-Rumanian negotiations.
The negotiations that started on August 16 soon came to a dead end, and since the Rumanian Government expressed several times its desire to solve the problem by arbitration, on August 30 the Second Vienna Award came into being. This decision gave Hungary back a territory of 43.541 ㎞2. Rumanian and the Hungarian statistics referring to the nationality division of this territory differ. Some 400.000 people of Hungarian nationality remained in the territory of Rumania. The decision had crucial consequences in domestic politics of the two countries. This inconvenient situation remains until the end of the W.W.Ⅱ.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘제2차 빈 협약’의 성립 배경: 독일과 소련의 입장
Ⅲ. ‘제2차 빈 협약’의 진행 과정과 내용
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstracts
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- ‘Icebreaker’ Thesis : 1941년 소련의 대독 선제공격 계획설
- 자율과 통제 사이의 독일 보건정치
- Reinhart Koselleck, Zur politischen Ikonologie des gewaltsamen Todes. Ein deutsch-franzosischer Vergleich, Basel 1998 (Schwabe & CO AG Verlag, 55 Seiten)
- 독일ㆍ소련의 대(對) 헝가리 전시외교정책
- 전후 독일의 탈나치화와 과거청산
- 체코-독일: 갈등과 공존의 역사
- 제2차 세계대전 당시 폴란드인들의 눈에 비친 독일
- 베르사이유에서 베르사이유까지
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!