본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

금융거래와 개인신용정보의 보호

이용수 34

영문명
Protection of Personal Credit Information in the Cross-border Financial Transactions
발행기관
경희법학연구소
저자명
박훤일(Park, Whon-Il)
간행물 정보
『경희법학』제41권 제1호, 149~176쪽, 전체 28쪽
주제분류
법학 > 민법
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2006.06.30
6,160

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

These days consumers are increasingly concerned about any possible chance of abuse and misuse of their credit information. Upon hearing endless reports of numerous ID theft and leakage of personal information, the affected data subjects are inclined to file lawsuits for compensation in group against such game companies and financial institutions as deemed responsible for the incidents. However, in the Information Age, it is useless and unwise to hide personal information. Brisk flow of favorable credit information will enhance considerably credit availability and job opportunities of a data subject. For example, in the Internet banking, active flow of credit information is conducive to the appropriate risk management of financial institutions. It is also helpful to assess the credit standing and to identify financial needs of customers so as to develop new financial products and to conduct aggressive marketing. The situation is all the more important in cross-border financial transactions. If an unauthorized use of a person s credit information results in credit fraud in a foreign country, we cannot figure out the scope of financial damage to the data subject as well as irrecoverable damage to his credit. In this case, we can count the EU Directive on data protection, which regulates the conditional data export to a third country, as a universal norm governing credit data flow. In the United States, there are the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In particular, the GLBA purports to supplement the existing privacy provisions of the FCRA. The GLBA financial privacy rule requires financial institutions to provide each consumer with a privacy notice at the time the consumer relationship is established and once a year thereafter. The privacy notice must explain the information collected about the consumer, where that information is shared, how that information is used, and how that information is protected. The notice must also identify the consumer s right to opt-out of the information being shared with unaffiliated parties. On the other hand, the GLBA safeguards rule requires financial institutions to develop a written information security plan that describes how the company is prepared for, and plans to continue to protect clients nonpublic personal information. This plan must include: ⅰ) denoting at least one employee to manage the safeguards, ⅱ) constructing a thorough risk management on each department handling the nonpublic information, ⅲ) developing, monitoring, and testing a program to secure the information, and ⅳ) changing the safeguards as needed with the changes in how information is collected, stored, and used. In 2003, FCRA was amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA, Public Law 108-159) to guard against identity theft. Once a credit information is infringed upon by means of phishing, pretexting, hacking and other illegal act, the resulting damage is almost immeasurable. So the financial institution is primarily held responsible for the data security of financial information of its customers. If a customer argues that his credit information is hurt by negligent management of financial institutions, they have to investigate disputed information. Also, users of the information for credit, insurance, or employment purposes must notify the consumer when an adverse action is taken on the basis of such reports. A proposed amendment to the GLBA (H.R. 3997) will oblige the relevant financial company to provide free credit report service to the affected customers so that the accuracy and completeness of the report may be verified or contested by them. It sounds reasonable because customers are not in a position to know the occurrence of, or to identify, the real damage arising out of the infringement upon their credit information. In Korea, the Act concerning the Use and Protection of Credit Information (the Act ) has been

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 국제적인 개인신용정보보호의 현황
Ⅲ. 개인신용정보 보호법제의 개선 움직임
Ⅳ. 우리나라 신용정보법에 대한 시사점

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박훤일(Park, Whon-Il). (2006).금융거래와 개인신용정보의 보호. 경희법학, 41 (1), 149-176

MLA

박훤일(Park, Whon-Il). "금융거래와 개인신용정보의 보호." 경희법학, 41.1(2006): 149-176

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제