본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

효율성 비교를 통한 나노기술 분야별 R&D 전략 수립

이용수 51

영문명
R&D Strategy Development for Nanotechnology Areas based on Efficiency Comparisons
발행기관
한국산업경영시스템학회
저자명
배성훈(Seoung-Hun Bae) 김준현(Jun-Hyun Kim) 정연주(Yeon-Ju Jung) 강상규(Sang-Kyu Kang) 김재신(Jae-Sin Kim) 김흥규(Heung-Kyu Kim)
간행물 정보
『산업경영시스템학회지』제40권 제2호, 31~40쪽, 전체 10쪽
주제분류
경제경영 > 경영학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2017.06.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In this paper, we compared the efficiencies of national R&D investments between NT (Nanotechnology) areas in terms of papers, patents, and commercializations, and found ways to improve the efficiencies of national R&D investments for each NT area. This is in response to huge R&D investments government has made recently in NT areas. Here, we collected data on investments, papers, patents, and commercializations for the R&D projects in NT areas through National Science & Technology Information Service. Based on the data, we analyzed the investment and performances (papers, patents, and commercializations) for each NT area, calculated the efficiency for each NT area, and compared the efficiencies between NT areas. Next, using cluster analysis, we identified several NT areas with similar characteristics in terms of paper efficiency, patent efficiency and commercialization efficiency. Finally, we derived implications for the efficiency enhancement for each grouping. The cluster analysis showed that there could be two groups, one being low in terms of technological outcome (papers and patents) efficiencies and high in terms of commercialization efficiencies, while the other being high in terms of technological outcome (papers and patents) efficiencies and low in terms of commercialization efficiencies. Therefore, the strategy for one group calls for support for technology transfer or technology introduction from other R&D performers and grant of guidance for improving R&D performers’ commercialization ability to other R&D performers while the strategy for the other group calls for R&D support for transfer of technology to other R&D performers, activation of technology transfer and support for commercialization of R&D performers.

목차

1. 서 론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 추세분석
4. R&D 투자에의 시사점
5. 결 론
Acknowledgement
References

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

배성훈(Seoung-Hun Bae),김준현(Jun-Hyun Kim),정연주(Yeon-Ju Jung),강상규(Sang-Kyu Kang),김재신(Jae-Sin Kim),김흥규(Heung-Kyu Kim). (2017).효율성 비교를 통한 나노기술 분야별 R&D 전략 수립. 산업경영시스템학회지, 40 (2), 31-40

MLA

배성훈(Seoung-Hun Bae),김준현(Jun-Hyun Kim),정연주(Yeon-Ju Jung),강상규(Sang-Kyu Kang),김재신(Jae-Sin Kim),김흥규(Heung-Kyu Kim). "효율성 비교를 통한 나노기술 분야별 R&D 전략 수립." 산업경영시스템학회지, 40.2(2017): 31-40

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제