본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

성리학과 지행문제

이용수 102

영문명
Neo-confucianism and Viewpoint of Knowledge and Conduct - focused on both Zhe zi and Wang Yangming Title
발행기관
한국교육철학회
저자명
이인철(Lee, In-Choul)
간행물 정보
『교육철학』敎育哲學 第61集, 105~141쪽, 전체 37쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 교육학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.12.30
7,240

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Modern society is drowning in a flood of information. Such information has set modern people free acting up to what they say. While an enthusiastic attitude to gain knowledge gives them absolute benefits in their lives, it is not necessarily true that a negative attitude to acquire knowledge causes some disadvantage to their lives. The expansion of knowledge can be successful through education. Immature children become mature through education, and such mature people in society tends to show the consistency of action and knowledge. The purpose of this study is about knowledge and its practice presented in Neo-Confucianism. This study will compare Zhu zi s viewpoint of knowledge and conduct with Wang’s viewpoint, two of whom are the representatives of this problem. Zhu zi s viewpoint is “First knowledge and then conduct”. Wang’s perspective is the unity of knowledge and conduct. However, their viewpoints have something in common as well as something different. First, both, knowledge and conduct, are equally important. Second, a focus on action rather than knowledge is stressed as a final goal to reach. Third, their viewpoints are human-centered philosophy. The problem cannot be discussed without focusing on human. Of course, there exist some different opinions between them. The matter of “the cognition of subject and object” is the first. While Zhu zi emphasizes the division of subject and object, Wang stresses the unity of subject and object. Having, thus, different approaches for the matter, Zhu zi puts more emphasis on human nature as a core logic, but Wang regards human mind as a core logic. The problem of knowledge and conduct is still one of philosophical issues to further study. It seems that modern society ostensibly has less interests in the problem of knowledge and conduct, but if you look closely at many problems in society, the necessity of studying the problem is strongly required. Modern people seem to have trouble acting proactively in their lives. In order to win any competition with others, modern people try to collect tremendous amount of information(knowledge), but they are very careful not to cross the border of illegality. This study is not about returning to the past, but about the unity, or the balance, of the knowledge and conduct.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 주자(朱子)의 지행관(知行觀)
Ⅲ. 양명(陽明)의 지행관(知行觀)
Ⅵ. 주자-양명 지행관의 동이성 (同異性)
Ⅴ. 나오는 말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이인철(Lee, In-Choul). (2016).성리학과 지행문제. 교육철학, 61 , 105-141

MLA

이인철(Lee, In-Choul). "성리학과 지행문제." 교육철학, 61.(2016): 105-141

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제