본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

퇴계의 이단배척과 교육적 함의

이용수 59

영문명
Toe-gye’s Rejecting the Heretical and It’s Educational Implication
발행기관
한국교육철학회
저자명
이인철(Lee, In-Choul)
간행물 정보
『교육철학』敎育哲學 第59集, 55~88쪽, 전체 34쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 교육학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2016.06.30
6,880

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The purpose of this research is to study rejecting the heretical(異端排斥) and its meaning with an intent to examining Toe-Gye(退溪) philosophy s identity and legitimacy. The reason why his rejecting the heretical(異端 排斥) is chosen for this research as follows; First, Toe-Gye(退溪) is a legitimate Neo-Confucian scholar who is sure of the legitimacy of the doctrines of Chu-tzu. Second, it is true that the doctrines of Chu-tzu in China was not established in a stable social atmosphere. Third, Toe-Gye’s rejecting the heretical(異端排斥) also tried to differentiate itself from Taoism and Buddism. In the process of differentiation, the Toe-Gye study had become philosophically logic and sophisticated. Accordingly, the study of rejecting the heretical(異端排斥) is both the starting point and the ending point in studying Toe-Gye s philosophy. The teachings of Wang Yangming are vital in understanding Toe-Gye rejecting the heretical(異端排斥). Toe-Gye criticised the teachings of Wang Yangming in Jeonseumrokppyeon(傳習錄辯; critical argument about the Chuanxilu). In the book, Toe-Gye criticised something about Jaechinmin(在親民) which is in The Great Learning(大學), about Mind is Principle(心卽理), a way to seek for good, about specific explanation to Jieojiseon(至善; to rest in the highest excellence or supreme good), and about Zhixingheyi(知行合一; The Unity of Knowledge and Action). Nonetheless, his criticism shows that he tried to reveal the limitation of Yangmingism. Unlike his attitude to Taoism and other thought, his criticism on Yangmingism was much more severe. The reason is that Mind-Philosophy(心學) in Yangmingism was closer to Buddism even though Yangmingism belongs to Confucianism. Toe-gye s criticism on Yangmingism seemed to be biased. Toe-gye s rejecting the heretical(異 端排斥) has its meanings from the aspect of consilient. First, it was a trial to build a complete Neo-Confucian idea. Second, clarifying the difference, his rejecting the heretical(異端排斥) had triggered academic debate. Finally, he emphasized the process-oriented attitude, not the outcome-oriented. Hence, the conception of heresy is a matter of right and wrong. In the middle of proving that his own opinions were correct, with process-oriented attitude, Toe-gye tried to draw a conclusion which is completed by modifications, transformation, and consensus.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 이단배척의 배경
Ⅲ. 「傳習錄辯」의 구성 및 내용 분석
Ⅳ. 교육적 함의
Ⅴ. 나오는 말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이인철(Lee, In-Choul). (2016).퇴계의 이단배척과 교육적 함의. 교육철학, 59 , 55-88

MLA

이인철(Lee, In-Choul). "퇴계의 이단배척과 교육적 함의." 교육철학, 59.(2016): 55-88

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제